These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15668388)

  • 21. Understanding auditory distance estimation by humpback whales: a computational approach.
    Mercado E; Green SR; Schneider JN
    Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 18068910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.
    Kolarik AJ; Moore BC; Zahorik P; Cirstea S; Pardhan S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):373-95. PubMed ID: 26590050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Direct-location versus verbal report methods for measuring auditory distance perception in the far field.
    Etchemendy PE; Spiousas I; Calcagno ER; Abregú E; Eguia MC; Vergara RO
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Jun; 50(3):1234-1247. PubMed ID: 28786043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surmising synchrony of sound and sight: Factors explaining variance of audiovisual integration in hurdling, tap dancing and drumming.
    Heins N; Pomp J; Kluger DS; Vinbrüx S; Trempler I; Kohler A; Kornysheva K; Zentgraf K; Raab M; Schubotz RI
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253130. PubMed ID: 34293800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual distance cues modulate neuromagnetic auditory N1m responses.
    Altmann CF; Matsuhashi M; Votinov M; Goto K; Mima T; Fukuyama H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Nov; 123(11):2273-80. PubMed ID: 22595325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sounds can alter the perceived direction of a moving visual object.
    Teramoto W; Hidaka S; Sugita Y; Sakamoto S; Gyoba J; Iwaya Y; Suzuki Y
    J Vis; 2012 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 22410584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sequential audiovisual interactions during speech perception: a whole-head MEG study.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Menning H; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(6):1342-54. PubMed ID: 17067640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neural latencies do not explain the auditory and audio-visual flash-lag effect.
    Arrighi R; Alais D; Burr D
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(23):2917-25. PubMed ID: 16115662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modeling the Perception of Audiovisual Distance: Bayesian Causal Inference and Other Models.
    Mendonça C; Mandelli P; Pulkki V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0165391. PubMed ID: 27959919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audiovisual integration increases the intentional step synchronization of side-by-side walkers.
    Noy D; Mouta S; Lamas J; Basso D; Silva C; Santos JA
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Dec; 56(Pt B):71-87. PubMed ID: 29107820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the influence of interaural differences on temporal perception of noise bursts of different durations.
    Schimmel O; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):986-97. PubMed ID: 18247901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Baseball's sight-audition farness effect (SAFE) when umpiring baserunners: Judging precedence of competing visual versus auditory events.
    Krynen RC; McBeath MK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 30335412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Encoding of event timing in the phase of neural oscillations.
    Kösem A; Gramfort A; van Wassenhove V
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 92():274-84. PubMed ID: 24531044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The subjective duration of audiovisual looming and receding stimuli.
    Grassi M; Pavan A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1321-33. PubMed ID: 22653547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Twice upon a time: multiple concurrent temporal recalibrations of audiovisual speech.
    Roseboom W; Arnold DH
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jul; 22(7):872-7. PubMed ID: 21690312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Best Distance Perception in Virtual Audiovisual Environment.
    Song H; Ma K
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():6010667. PubMed ID: 35800684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Retinal blur and the perception of egocentric distance.
    Vishwanath D; Blaser E
    J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):26. PubMed ID: 20884491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Closer in time when farther in space--spatial factors in audiovisual temporal integration.
    Noesselt T; Fendrich R; Bonath B; Tyll S; Heinze HJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):443-58. PubMed ID: 16129586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity.
    Fujisaki W; Shimojo S; Kashino M; Nishida S
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Jul; 7(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 15195098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.