These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15669625)

  • 1. Task-based lens design with application to digital mammography.
    Chen L; Barrett HH
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Jan; 22(1):148-67. PubMed ID: 15669625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of clinical full field digital mammography with the task specific system-model-based Fourier Hotelling observer (SMFHO) SNR.
    Liu H; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Benevides L; Gu S; Kyprianou IS
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051907. PubMed ID: 24784386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptation of a clustered lumpy background model for task-based image quality assessment in x-ray phase-contrast mammography.
    Zysk AM; Brankov JG; Wernick MN; Anastasio MA
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):906-11. PubMed ID: 22320800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
    Lauria A
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A fast, angle-dependent, analytical model of CsI detector response for optimization of 3D x-ray breast imaging systems.
    Freed M; Park S; Badano A
    Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2593-605. PubMed ID: 20632571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography.
    El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15493691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of nonlinear human visual system components on performance of a channelized Hotelling observer in structured backgrounds.
    Zhang Y; Pham BT; Eckstein MP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Oct; 25(10):1348-62. PubMed ID: 17024838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4221-35. PubMed ID: 17153401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward objective and quantitative evaluation of imaging systems using images of phantoms.
    Gagne RM; Gallas BD; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 16485413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.
    Gong X; Vedula AA; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2183-95. PubMed ID: 15248571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer aided detection of masses in mammography using subregion Hotelling observers.
    Baydush AH; Catarious DM; Abbey CK; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1781-7. PubMed ID: 12906196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative imaging in breast tomosynthesis and CT: comparison of detection and estimation task performance.
    Richard S; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2627-37. PubMed ID: 20632574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo simulation of the image formation process in portal imaging.
    Bissonnette JP; Munro P; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3243-50. PubMed ID: 14713091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of the human observer detecting random signals in random backgrounds.
    Park S; Clarkson E; Kupinski MA; Barrett HH
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Jan; 22(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 15669610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of difference of Gaussian filters in the detection of mammographic regions.
    Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4104-14. PubMed ID: 17153390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of a tomosynthesis system for the detection of lung nodules.
    Pineda AR; Yoon S; Paik DS; Fahrig R
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1372-9. PubMed ID: 16752573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mathematical model platform for optimizing a multiprojection breast imaging system.
    Chawla AS; Samei E; Saunders RS; Lo JY; Baker JA
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1337-45. PubMed ID: 18491528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.