BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15669915)

  • 1. Increased accommodation following adaptation to image blur in myopes.
    Vera-Diaz FA; Gwiazda J; Thorn F; Held R
    J Vis; 2004 Dec; 4(12):1111-9. PubMed ID: 15669915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Static accommodative responses following adaptation to differential levels of blur.
    Cufflin MP; Hazel CA; Mallen EA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jul; 27(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 17584286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variability of the accommodation response in early onset myopia.
    Langaas T; Riddell PM; Svarverud E; Ystenaes AE; Langeggen I; Bruenech JR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 18174839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of blur adaptation on accommodative response and pupil size during reading.
    Le R; Bao J; Chen D; He JC; Lu F
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):1. PubMed ID: 21131561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of accommodative adaptation on static and dynamic accommodation in emmetropia and late-onset myopia.
    Jiang BC; White JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 May; 76(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 10375245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes.
    Radhakrishnan H; Allen PM; Charman WN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 48(9):4375-82. PubMed ID: 17724230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binocular adaptation to +2 D lenses in myopic and emmetropic children.
    Sreenivasan V; Irving EL; Bobier WR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):731-40. PubMed ID: 19390469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of heterophoria type and myopia on accommodative and vergence responses during sustained near activity in children.
    Sreenivasan V; Irving EL; Bobier WR
    Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 57():9-17. PubMed ID: 22322001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes.
    Poulere E; Moschandreas J; Kontadakis GA; Pallikaris IG; Plainis S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23297779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of blur adaptation on blur sensitivity and discrimination in emmetropes and myopes.
    Cufflin MP; Mankowska A; Mallen EA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 48(6):2932-9. PubMed ID: 17525230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retinal image quality during accommodation in adult myopic eyes.
    Sreenivasan V; Aslakson E; Kornaus A; Thibos LN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Nov; 90(11):1292-303. PubMed ID: 24152885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in dynamics of accommodation after accommodative facility training in myopes and emmetropes.
    Allen PM; Charman WN; Radhakrishnan H
    Vision Res; 2010 May; 50(10):947-55. PubMed ID: 20304003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through near addition lenses.
    Jiang BC; Tea YC; O'Donnell D
    Optometry; 2007 Mar; 78(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 17321462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Near work-induced transient myopia in Indian subjects.
    Sivaraman V; Rizwana JH; Ramani K; Price H; Calver R; Pardhan S; Vasudevan B; Allen PM
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Nov; 98(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 26497844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes: a summary and update.
    Schmid KL; Strang NC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Nov; 35(6):613-21. PubMed ID: 26497293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic accommodation responses following adaptation to defocus.
    Cufflin MP; Mallen EA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Oct; 85(10):982-91. PubMed ID: 18832977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accommodation in emmetropic and myopic young adults wearing bifocal soft contact lenses.
    Tarrant J; Severson H; Wildsoet CF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 18201337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of monocular and binocular viewing on the accommodation response to real targets in emmetropia and myopia.
    Seidel D; Gray LS; Heron G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 82(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 15829856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of common reductions in letter size and contrast on accommodation responses in young adult myopes and emmetropes.
    Schmid KL; Hilmer KS; Lawrence RA; Loh SY; Morrish LJ; Brown B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 82(7):602-11. PubMed ID: 16044072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Myopes show increased susceptibility to nearwork aftereffects.
    Ciuffreda KJ; Wallis DM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Sep; 39(10):1797-803. PubMed ID: 9727402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.