322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15669996)
1. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to read fetal heart rate tracings in labor: a comparison between ACOG and NICE guidelines.
Buscicchio G; Gentilucci L; Martorana R; Martino C; Tranquilli AL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2797-8. PubMed ID: 22881995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of the 2008 NICHD Research Planning Workshop: recommendations for fetal heart rate terminology and interpretation.
Hankins GD; Miller DA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21278495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver reliability of fetal heart rate pattern interpretation using NICHD definitions.
Epstein AJ; Twogood S; Lee RH; Opper N; Beavis A; Miller DA
Am J Perinatol; 2013 Jun; 30(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 23161350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome.
Figueras F; Albela S; Bonino S; Palacio M; Barrau E; Hernandez S; Casellas C; Coll O; Cararach V
J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15914348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
Devane D; Lalor J
J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unselected low-risk pregnancies and the effect of continuous intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring on umbilical blood gases and cerebral palsy.
Sameshima H; Ikenoue T; Ikeda T; Kamitomo M; Ibara S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 14749646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN.
Vayssière C; Tsatsaris V; Pirrello O; Cristini C; Arnaud C; Goffinet F
BJOG; 2009 Jul; 116(8):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 19515149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver agreements in assessing 549 labor admission tests after a standardized training program.
Blix E; Oian P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1087-92. PubMed ID: 16232177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracing by physician and computer.
Bracero LA; Roshanfekr D; Byrne DW
J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 10914628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal electrocardiography: feasibility of long-term fetal heart rate recordings.
Graatsma EM; Jacod BC; van Egmond LA; Mulder EJ; Visser GH
BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):334-7; discussion 337-8. PubMed ID: 19076966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making.
Ross MG; Devoe LD; Rosen KG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Mar; 15(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 15280144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The medico-legal value of monitoring of the fetal heart rate during labor].
Cynober E; Jeny R
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(6):561-6; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 9453971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of different sampling intervals on the measurement of intrapartum fetal heart rate variability.
Wilcox MA; Wang W; Sahota DS; Dawkins RR; Chung TK; Chang AM
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):577-80. PubMed ID: 9083315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts.
Blix E; Sviggum O; Koss KS; Øian P
BJOG; 2003 Jan; 110(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12504927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor.
Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: evaluation of a standardized system of interpretation for prediction of metabolic acidosis at delivery and neonatal neurological morbidity.
Soncini E; Paganelli S; Vezzani C; Gargano G; Giovanni Battista LS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Sep; 27(14):1465-9. PubMed ID: 24156253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual interpretation of the effect of maternal betamethasone administration on the fetal heart rate pattern.
van Iddekinge B; Hofmeyr GJ; Buchmann E
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 12881071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System.
Blackwell SC; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Gyamfi Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 205(4):378.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21864826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
