337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15670995)
1. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging.
Yamamuro M; Tadamura E; Kubo S; Toyoda H; Nishina T; Ohba M; Hosokawa R; Kimura T; Tamaki N; Komeda M; Kita T; Konishi J
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 15670995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Left ventricular functional analysis with 16- and 64-row multidetector computed tomography: comparison with gated single-photon emission computed tomography.
Agarwal PP; Patel S; Corbett J; Jung JI; Barber K; Schipper M; Kazerooni EA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 19188778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience.
Juergens KU; Grude M; Maintz D; Fallenberg EM; Wichter T; Heindel W; Fischbach R
Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):403-10. PubMed ID: 14668428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging].
Koch K; Oellig F; Kunz P; Bender P; Oberholzer K; Mildenberger P; Hake U; Kreitner KF; Thelen M
Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1786-93. PubMed ID: 15573290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is the optimal clinical technique for measurement of left ventricular volume after myocardial infarction? A comparative study of 3-dimensional echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Chan J; Jenkins C; Khafagi F; Du L; Marwick TH
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Feb; 19(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 16455424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of global and regional cardiac function using 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison study with echocardiography, gated-SPECT and cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Wu YW; Tadamura E; Yamamuro M; Kanao S; Okayama S; Ozasa N; Toma M; Kimura T; Komeda M; Togashi K
Int J Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 128(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 17692410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.
Schlosser T; Mohrs OK; Magedanz A; Voigtländer T; Schmermund A; Barkhausen J
Acta Radiol; 2007 Feb; 48(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17325922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Right ventricular function in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: analysis with electrocardiography-synchronized multi-detector row CT.
Doğan H; Kroft LJ; Huisman MV; van der Geest RJ; de Roos A
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 17090717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Isolated mitral regurgitation: quantitative assessment with 64-section multidetector CT--comparison with MR imaging and echocardiography.
Guo YK; Yang ZG; Ning G; Rao L; Dong L; Pen Y; Zhang TM; Wu Y; Zhang XC; Wang QL
Radiology; 2009 Aug; 252(2):369-76. PubMed ID: 19451543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of left ventricular volumes using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT): phantom and human studies.
Hosoi S; Mochizuki T; Miyagawa M; Shen Y; Murase K; Ikezoe J
Radiat Med; 2003; 21(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 12816352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional imaging in the assessment of myocardial infarction: MR imaging vs. MDCT vs. SPECT.
Mahnken AH; Bruners P; Stanzel S; Koos R; Mühlenbruch G; Günther RW; Reinartz P
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):480-5. PubMed ID: 18650043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality.
Herzog C; Arning-Erb M; Zangos S; Eichler K; Hammerstingl R; Dogan S; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 16373760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Salm LP; Schuijf JD; de Roos A; Lamb HJ; Vliegen HW; Jukema JW; Joemai R; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ
Eur J Echocardiogr; 2006 Aug; 7(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 16098814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of right ventricular function for patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis by 64-slice multi-detector row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Zhang XC; Yang ZG; Guo YK; Zhang RM; Wang J; Zhou DQ; Cheng L; Chen L
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Apr; 125(8):1469-74. PubMed ID: 22613655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic imaging of patients in a memory clinic: comparison of MR imaging and 64-detector row CT.
Wattjes MP; Henneman WJ; van der Flier WM; de Vries O; Träber F; Geurts JJ; Scheltens P; Vrenken H; Barkhof F
Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):174-83. PubMed ID: 19635835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Absolute quantification of left ventricular global and regional function at nuclear MPI using ultrafast CZT SPECT: initial validation versus cardiac MR.
Cochet H; Bullier E; Gerbaud E; Durieux M; Godbert Y; Lederlin M; Coste P; Barat JL; Laurent F; Montaudon M
J Nucl Med; 2013 Apr; 54(4):556-63. PubMed ID: 23385955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance.
Raman SV; Shah M; McCarthy B; Garcia A; Ferketich AK
Am Heart J; 2006 Mar; 151(3):736-44. PubMed ID: 16504643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard.
Greupner J; Zimmermann E; Grohmann A; Dübel HP; Althoff TF; Borges AC; Rutsch W; Schlattmann P; Hamm B; Dewey M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(21):1897-907. PubMed ID: 22595410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of multi-detector row computed tomography with echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular function in healthy dogs.
Henjes CR; Hungerbühler S; Bojarski IB; Nolte I; Wefstaedt P
Am J Vet Res; 2012 Mar; 73(3):393-403. PubMed ID: 22369532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of global and regional left ventricular function assessed by gated-SPECT and 2-D echocardiography.
Cwajg E; Cwajg J; Keng F; He ZX; Nagueh S; Verani MS
Rev Port Cardiol; 2000 Feb; 19 Suppl 1():I39-46. PubMed ID: 10750438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
