585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15671360)
1. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities.
Ho WT; Lam PW
Clin Radiol; 2003 Feb; 58(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 12623042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection.
The JS; Schilling KJ; Hoffmeister JW; Friedmann E; McGinnis R; Holcomb RG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 19155392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast-specific gamma imaging for the detection of breast cancer in dense versus nondense breasts.
Rechtman LR; Lenihan MJ; Lieberman JH; Teal CB; Torrente J; Rapelyea JA; Brem RF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 24450668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of breast density on computer aided detection.
Malich A; Fischer DR; Facius M; Petrovitch A; Boettcher J; Marx C; Hansch A; Kaiser WA
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Sep; 18(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 15827823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Impact of mammographic breast density on computer-assisted detection (CAD) in a breast imaging department].
Romero Castellano C; Varela Nuñez C; Cuena Boy R; Almenar Gil A; Pinto Varela JM; Botella Lopez M
Radiologia; 2011; 53(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 21641624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts.
Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Morra L; Sacchetto D; Durando M; Agliozzo S; Carbonaro LA; Delsanto S; Pesce B; Persano D; Mariscotti G; Marra V; Fonio P; Bert A
Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25961633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 17554186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography.
Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1475-82. PubMed ID: 17114540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology.
Brem RF; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Hoffmeister JW; Desimio MP
Cancer; 2005 Sep; 104(5):931-5. PubMed ID: 16047331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system.
Malich A; Sauner D; Marx C; Facius M; Boehm T; Pfleiderer SO; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):851-6. PubMed ID: 12869683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results.
Baum F; Fischer U; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
Eur Radiol; 2002 Dec; 12(12):3015-7. PubMed ID: 12439584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
