These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15671375)

  • 1. Thin-section MRI with a phased-array coil for preoperative evaluation of pelvic anatomy and tumor extent in patients with rectal cancer.
    Akasu T; Iinuma G; Fujita T; Muramatsu Y; Tateishi U; Miyakawa K; Murakami T; Moriyama N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 15671375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of thin-section magnetic resonance imaging with a pelvic phased-array coil in the local staging of rectal cancer.
    Halefoglu AM; Atasoy ST; Sakiz D; Baykan A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 23321834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by magnetic resonance imaging with a pelvic phased-array coil.
    Hadfield MB; Nicholson AA; MacDonald AW; Farouk R; Lee PW; Duthie GS; Monson JR
    Br J Surg; 1997 Apr; 84(4):529-31. PubMed ID: 9112909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of using endorectal coil in preoperative staging of rectal carcinomas by pelvic MR imaging.
    Donmez FY; Tunaci M; Yekeler E; Balik E; Tunaci A; Acunas G
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jul; 67(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 17720346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of thin section magnetic resonance using phased-array pelvic coil in predicting the T-staging of rectal cancer.
    Poon FW; McDonald A; Anderson JH; Duthie F; Rodger C; McCurrach G; McKee RF; Horgan PG; Foulis AK; Chong D; Finlay IG
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Feb; 53(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 15664289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ability of phased-array MRI in preoperative staging of primary rectal cancer: correlation with histopathological results.
    Karatağ O; Karatağ GY; Özkurt H; Değirmenci HK; Avlanmış Ö; Başak M; Baykan A
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2012; 18(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21671218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local staging of rectal cancer using combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coil MRI.
    Tatli S; Mortele KJ; Breen EL; Bleday R; Silverman SG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 16523466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre-operative assessment of extramural invasion and sphincteral involvement in rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging with phased-array coil.
    Ferri M; Laghi A; Mingazzini P; Iafrate F; Meli L; Ricci F; Passariello R; Ziparo V
    Colorectal Dis; 2005 Jul; 7(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 15932564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.
    Torricelli P; Lo Russo S; Pecchi A; Luppi G; Cesinaro AM; Romagnoli R
    Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11859303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
    Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Akasu T; Iinuma G; Takawa M; Yamamoto S; Muramatsu Y; Moriyama N
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):2787-94. PubMed ID: 19618244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma.
    Kim MJ; Chung JJ; Lee YH; Lee JT; Yoo HS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1215-21. PubMed ID: 9129414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
    Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
    Meyenberger C; Huch Böni RA; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
    Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry in 186 patients with rectal cancer confirms an overlap in pelvic size between males and females.
    Salerno G; Daniels IR; Brown G; Heald RJ; Moran BJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):772-6. PubMed ID: 17032323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.
    Yu KK; Hricak H; Subak LL; Zaloudek CJ; Powell CB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 9725301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging predicts sphincter invasion of low rectal cancer and influences selection of operation.
    Holzer B; Urban M; Hölbling N; Feil W; Novi G; Hruby W; Rosen HR; Schiessel R
    Surgery; 2003 Jun; 133(6):656-61. PubMed ID: 12796734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in rectal cancer.
    Martling A; Holm T; Bremmer S; Lindholm J; Cedermark B; Blomqvist L
    Br J Surg; 2003 Nov; 90(11):1422-8. PubMed ID: 14598425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Degree of error of thin-section MR in measuring extramural depth of tumor invasion in patients with rectal cancer.
    Park SH
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):647; author reply 647-8. PubMed ID: 18227560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging.
    Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.