These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15671407)

  • 21. Mammography and malpractice litigation: current status, lessons, and admonitions.
    Brenner RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):931-5. PubMed ID: 8273628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The spectrum of breast asymmetries: imaging features, work-up, management.
    Sickles EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):765-71, v. PubMed ID: 17888767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Communication errors in radiology: a liability cost analysis.
    Brenner RJ; Bartholomew L
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 17411849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The ACR's Mammography Accreditation Program: ten years of experience since MQSA.
    Destouet JM; Bassett LW; Yaffe MJ; Butler PF; Wilcox PA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):585-94. PubMed ID: 17411883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast Imaging: The Face of Imaging 3.0.
    Mayo RC; Parikh JR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Aug; 13(8):1003-7. PubMed ID: 27162041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program.
    Kan L; Olivotto IA; Warren Burhenne LJ; Sickles EA; Coldman AJ
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):563-7. PubMed ID: 10796940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preliminary report of an intervention to improve mammography skills of radiologists.
    D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A; Costanza ME; Gaw VP
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 293():151-7. PubMed ID: 2726930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Medicolegal: malpractice and ethical issues in radiology.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):W533. PubMed ID: 23617522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Experience enhances mammographic interpretation, doesn't it?
    Moskowitz M
    Cancer; 1998 Dec; 83(12):2430-1. PubMed ID: 9874444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. To telephone or not to telephone: how high is the standard?
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Dec; 159(6):1335-9. PubMed ID: 1442411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The reliability of measuring physical characteristics of spiculated masses on mammography.
    Sampat MP; Whitman GJ; Stephens TW; Broemeling LD; Heger NA; Bovik AC; Markey MK
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S134-40. PubMed ID: 17209119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Problems with the American College of Radiology Standard for Diagnostic Mammography.
    Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1367-9. PubMed ID: 7484565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.
    Elmore JG; Taplin SH; Barlow WE; Cutter GR; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE; Abraham LA; Fosse JS; Carney PA
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 15987961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditing and benchmarks in screening and diagnostic mammography.
    Feig SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):791-800, vi. PubMed ID: 17888769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [AG Mamma -- consensus meeting, the teacher in breast diagnostics on 04.05.2013 in Frankfurt am Main -- standards in technology and reporting].
    Müller-Schimpfle M; Heindel W; Kettritz U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bick U
    Rofo; 2014 Apr; 186(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 24691807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mammography malpractice litigation and the impact of MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act).
    Whiteman T
    Adm Radiol; 1995 Mar; 14(3):29-31. PubMed ID: 10142158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Concerning radiologists reported to the HSAN--is everything unclear to be punctured?].
    Gullsby S
    Lakartidningen; 2004 May; 101(19):1745. PubMed ID: 15188597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. New American college of radiology guidelines on mammography.
    Bol Asoc Med P R; 1983 Jan; 75(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 6590044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Long-term retention of mammographic computer-assisted diagnosis information is neither necessary nor desirable.
    Guenin M
    Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):595-6; author reply 596-7. PubMed ID: 14752196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment.
    Tan A; Freeman DH; Goodwin JS; Freeman JL
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Dec; 100(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 16819566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.