294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15671706)
1. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Zollinger TW; Maraj M; Skinner CS; Zoppi KA; Muegge CM
Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jan; 9(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 12549813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; McQuillen D; Martin D; Maraj M
Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 29(5):374-82. PubMed ID: 10564629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhancing compliance with screening mammography recommendations: a clinical trial in a primary care office.
Mohler PJ
Fam Med; 1995 Feb; 27(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7737444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.
Barr JK; Franks AL; Lee NC; Antonucci DM; Rifkind S; Schachter M
Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep; 7(9):887-94. PubMed ID: 11570022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women.
Crane LA; Leakey TA; Ehrsam G; Rimer BK; Warnecke RB
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Sep; 9(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 11008910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase screening in HMO women overdue for Pap test and mammography services.
Lynch FL; Whitlock EP; Valanis BG; Smith SK
Prev Med; 2004 Apr; 38(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 15020173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use.
Lairson DR; DiCarlo M; Myers RE; Wolf T; Cocroft J; Sifri R; Rosenthal M; Vernon SW; Wender R
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(4):779-88. PubMed ID: 18098272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Chaudhry R; Scheitel SM; McMurtry EK; Leutink DJ; Cabanela RL; Naessens JM; Rahman AS; Davis LA; Stroebel RJ
Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 17389293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of standard care counseling or telephone/in-person counseling on beliefs, knowledge, and behavior related to mammography screening.
Champion VL; Skinner CS; Foster JL
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2000; 27(10):1565-71. PubMed ID: 11103375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tailored messages, external barriers, and women's utilization of professional breast cancer screening over time.
Lauver DR; Settersten L; Kane JH; Henriques JB
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 97(11):2724-35. PubMed ID: 12767084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.
Myers RE; Sifri R; Hyslop T; Rosenthal M; Vernon SW; Cocroft J; Wolf T; Andrel J; Wender R
Cancer; 2007 Nov; 110(9):2083-91. PubMed ID: 17893869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence.
Champion V; Skinner CS; Hui S; Monahan P; Juliar B; Daggy J; Menon U
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Mar; 65(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 17196358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized controlled trial of a repeat mammography intervention: effect of adherence definitions on results.
Partin MR; Slater JS; Caplan L
Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):734-40. PubMed ID: 16043216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of three methods for improving mammography rates in a managed care plan.
Davis NA; Nash E; Bailey C; Lewis MJ; Rimer BK; Koplan JP
Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 9236968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to enhance mammography use.
Fishman P; Taplin S; Meyer D; Barlow W
Eff Clin Pract; 2000; 3(5):213-20. PubMed ID: 11185326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Telephone reminders increase re-screening in a county breast screening program.
Goel A; George J; Burack RC
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2008 May; 19(2):512-21. PubMed ID: 18469422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of patient and provider reminders on mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening in a large health maintenance organization.
Somkin CP; Hiatt RA; Hurley LB; Gruskin E; Ackerson L; Larson P
Arch Intern Med; 1997 Aug 11-25; 157(15):1658-64. PubMed ID: 9250226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
