BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15671706)

  • 41. Intervention to increase screening mammography among women 65 and older.
    Michielutte R; Sharp PC; Foley KL; Cunningham LE; Spangler JG; Paskett ED; Case LD
    Health Educ Res; 2005 Apr; 20(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 15254001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Increasing pneumococcal vaccination in managed care through telephone outreach.
    Winston CA; Mims AD; Leatherwood KA
    Am J Manag Care; 2007 Oct; 13(10):581-8. PubMed ID: 17927463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Impact of a telephone counseling intervention on transitions in stage of change and adherence to interval mammography screening (United States).
    Carney PA; Harwood BG; Greene MA; Goodrich ME
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Sep; 16(7):799-807. PubMed ID: 16132790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cost-effectiveness analysis of integrated care for people with HIV, chronic mental illness and substance abuse disorders.
    Weaver MR; Conover CJ; Proescholdbell RJ; Arno PS; Ang A; Uldall KK; Ettner SL
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2009 Mar; 12(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 19346565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Screening mammography: a cross-sectional study to compare characteristics of women aged 40 and older from the deep South who are current, overdue, and never screeners.
    Lopez ED; Khoury AJ; Dailey AB; Hall AG; Chisholm LR
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):434-45. PubMed ID: 19879455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Associations in breast and colon cancer screening behavior in women.
    Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Patterson SK; Bernstein SJ
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Apr; 12(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 15831418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Differences in predictors of cervical and breast cancer screening by screening need in uninsured Latino women.
    Buki LP; Jamison J; Anderson CJ; Cuadra AM
    Cancer; 2007 Oct; 110(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 17696119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer.
    Eaker S; Adami HO; Granath F; Wilander E; Sparén P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 15006907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of appointment scheduling and reminder postcards on adherence to mammography recommendations.
    Wolosin RJ
    J Fam Pract; 1990 May; 30(5):542-7. PubMed ID: 2332744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Women's compliance with public health guidelines for mammograms and pap tests in Canada and the United States: an analysis of data from the Joint Canada/United States Survey Of Health.
    Blackwell DL; Martinez ME; Gentleman JF
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):85-99. PubMed ID: 18182305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Automated messaging to improve compliance with diabetes test monitoring.
    Derose SF; Nakahiro RK; Ziel FH
    Am J Manag Care; 2009 Jul; 15(7):425-31. PubMed ID: 19589010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Personal contact from friends to increase mammography usage.
    Calle EE; Miracle-McMahill HL; Moss RE; Heath CW
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(6):361-6. PubMed ID: 7880557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Does telephone contact with a physician's office staff improve mammogram screening rates?
    Bodiya A; Vorias D; Dickson HA
    Fam Med; 1999 May; 31(5):324-6. PubMed ID: 10407709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
    Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of a mail and telephone intervention on breast health behaviors.
    Bowen DJ; Powers D
    Health Educ Behav; 2010 Aug; 37(4):479-89. PubMed ID: 20157016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Measuring mammography compliance: lessons learned from a survival analysis of screening behavior.
    Partin MR; Casey-Paal AL; Slater JS; Korn JE
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1998 Aug; 7(8):681-7. PubMed ID: 9718220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: a meta-analysis.
    Wagner TH
    Am J Prev Med; 1998 Jan; 14(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 9476837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A randomized controlled trial comparing three invitation strategies in a breast cancer screening program.
    Segura JM; Castells X; Casamitjana M; Macià F; Porta M; Katz SJ
    Prev Med; 2001 Oct; 33(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 11570837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Facility-based inreach strategies to promote annual mammograms.
    Mayer JA; Clapp EJ; Bartholomew S; offer J
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 7880555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Mammography interventions for 65- to 74-year-old HMO women. Program effectiveness and predictors of use.
    King ES; Ross E; Seay J; Balshem A; Rimer B
    J Aging Health; 1995 Nov; 7(4):529-51. PubMed ID: 10165968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.