BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15671706)

  • 81. Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.
    Luckmann R; White MJ; Costanza ME; Frisard CF; Cranos C; Sama S; Yood R
    Transl Behav Med; 2017 Sep; 7(3):547-556. PubMed ID: 28452044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Effects of different reminder strategies on first-time mammography screening among women in Taiwan.
    Lin ML; Huang JJ; Li SH; Lee FH; Hou MF; Wang HH
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Feb; 20(1):114. PubMed ID: 32050951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Collaborative centralized reminder/recall notification to increase immunization rates among young children: a comparative effectiveness trial.
    Kempe A; Saville AW; Dickinson LM; Beaty B; Eisert S; Gurfinkel D; Brewer S; Shull H; Herrero D; Herlihy R
    JAMA Pediatr; 2015 Apr; 169(4):365-73. PubMed ID: 25706340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of letters, automated telephone messages, or both for underimmunized children in a health maintenance organization.
    Lieu TA; Capra AM; Makol J; Black SB; Shinefield HR
    Pediatrics; 1998 Apr; 101(4):E3. PubMed ID: 9521970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Better care for breast cancer.
    Zablocki E
    HMO; 1995; 36(4):64-9. PubMed ID: 10166489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. [Mammography screening as early detection measure. Pro].
    Koch MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1996; 259 Suppl 1():S161-77. PubMed ID: 9133270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Reminder letter, tailored stepped-care, and self-choice comparison for repeat mammography.
    Rakowski W; Lipkus IM; Clark MA; Rimer BK; Ehrich B; Lyna PR; Kornguth PJ
    Am J Prev Med; 2003 Nov; 25(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 14580632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods.
    Stein K; Lewendon G; Jenkins R; Davis C
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 16417695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Comparability of skin screening histories obtained by telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires: a randomized crossover study.
    Aitken JF; Youl PH; Janda M; Elwood M; Ring IT; Lowe JB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 160(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 15353421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. A randomized trial of telephone counseling to promote screening mammography in two HMOs.
    Luckmann R; Savageau JA; Clemow L; Stoddard AM; Costanza ME
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2003; 27(6):442-50. PubMed ID: 14642552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. The relative effectiveness of three reminder letters. On making and keeping mammogram appointments.
    Kendall C; Hailey BJ
    Hosp Top; 1994; 72(2):28-33. PubMed ID: 10134874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. A prospective randomized study of two reminding strategies: telephone versus mail in the screening of cervical cancer in women who did not initially respond.
    Heranney D; Fender M; Velten M; Baldauf JJ
    Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 21791902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Does telephone scheduling assistance increase mammography screening adherence?
    Payton CA; Sarfaty M; Beckett S; Campos C; Hilbert K
    Am J Manag Care; 2015 Nov; 21(11):e618-22. PubMed ID: 26735295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a church-based intervention to promote mammography screening.
    Stockdale SE; Keeler E; Duan N; Derose KP; Fox SA
    Health Serv Res; 2000 Dec; 35(5 Pt 1):1037-57. PubMed ID: 11130802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: a randomized study.
    Taplin SH; Barlow WE; Ludman E; MacLehos R; Meyer DM; Seger D; Herta D; Chin C; Curry S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Feb; 92(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 10655440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Costs of achieving high patient compliance after recall from screening mammography.
    Blane CE; Pinsky RW; Joe AI; Pichan AE; Blajan MR; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Apr; 188(4):894-6. PubMed ID: 17377019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Cost-effectiveness of targeted versus tailored interventions to promote mammography screening among women military veterans in the United States.
    Lairson DR; Chan W; Chang YC; del Junco DJ; Vernon SW
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 May; 34(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 20810168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. A pilot randomized controlled trial of telephone intervention to increase Breast Cancer Screening uptake in socially deprived areas in Scotland (TELBRECS).
    Chambers JA; Gracie K; Millar R; Cavanagh J; Archibald D; Cook A; O'Carroll RE
    J Med Screen; 2016 Sep; 23(3):141-9. PubMed ID: 26566950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Recommended care adherence: improved by patient reminder letters but with potential attenuation by the healthcare process complexity.
    Zhang Z; Fish J
    Qual Prim Care; 2012; 20(2):149-64. PubMed ID: 22824568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Telephone versus mail interventions for maintenance of physical activity in older adults.
    Castro CM; King AC; Brassington GS
    Health Psychol; 2001 Nov; 20(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 11714186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.