These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15671706)

  • 101. The impact of tailored interventions on a community health center population.
    Rimer BK; Conaway M; Lyna P; Glassman B; Yarnall KS; Lipkus I; Barber LT
    Patient Educ Couns; 1999 Jun; 37(2):125-40. PubMed ID: 14528540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 102. Effectiveness, costs, and cost-effectiveness of recruitment strategies for a mammographic screening program to detect breast cancer.
    Hurley SF; Jolley DJ; Livingston PM; Reading D; Cockburn J; Flint-Richter D
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Jun; 84(11):855-63. PubMed ID: 1593653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 103. Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminder letters on mammography screening compliance.
    Romaire MA; Bowles EJ; Anderson ML; Buist DS
    Prev Med; 2012 Aug; 55(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 22627089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 104. Bringing prevention home.
    Zablocki E
    Healthplan; 1996; 37(2):28-35. PubMed ID: 10161653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 105. Screening strategies aim to increase compliance.
    Bassett LW
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Sep; 13(9):75-9, 165. PubMed ID: 10149733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 106. Cost-effectiveness of mammography for older women.
    Finucane TE
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 May; 140(10):844; author reply 844. PubMed ID: 15148077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 107. Effects of health beliefs about mammography and breast cancer and telephone reminders on re-screening in Turkey.
    Baysal HY; Gozum S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(6):1445-50. PubMed ID: 22126479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 108. Do vouchers improve breast cancer screening rates? Results from a randomized trial.
    Stoner TJ; Dowd B; Carr WP; Maldonado G; Church TR; Mandel J
    Health Serv Res; 1998 Apr; 33(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 9566175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 109. Effect of a multimodal reminder program on repeat mammogram screening.
    Feldstein AC; Perrin N; Rosales AG; Schneider J; Rix MM; Keels K; Schoap S; Glasgow RE
    Am J Prev Med; 2009 Aug; 37(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 19589447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 110. Effectiveness of interventions to increase the participation rate of gastric cancer screening in the Republic of Korea: a pilot study.
    Lee MH; Lee YY; Jung DW; Park B; Yun EH; Lee HY; Jun JK; Choi KS
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(3):861-6. PubMed ID: 22631662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 111. Effectiveness of telephone counseling for mammography: results from five randomized trials.
    Stoddard AM; Fox SA; Costanza ME; Lane DS; Andersen MR; Urban N; Lipkus I; Rimer BK;
    Prev Med; 2002 Jan; 34(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 11749101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 112. The effect of patient and physician reminders on use of screening mammography in a health maintenance organization. Results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Burack RC; Gimotty PA; George J; Simon MS; Dews P; Moncrease A
    Cancer; 1996 Oct; 78(8):1708-21. PubMed ID: 8859184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 113. Tailored telephone counseling to improve adherence to follow-up regimens after an abnormal pap smear among minority, underserved women.
    Miller SM; Hui SK; Wen KY; Scarpato J; Zhu F; Buzaglo J; Hernandez EE
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):488-95. PubMed ID: 24007767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 114. Randomized trial of DVD, telephone, and usual care for increasing mammography adherence.
    Champion VL; Rawl SM; Bourff SA; Champion KM; Smith LG; Buchanan AH; Fish LJ; Monahan PO; Stump TE; Springston JK; Gathirua-Mwangi WG; Skinner CS
    J Health Psychol; 2016 Jun; 21(6):916-26. PubMed ID: 25070967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 115. Affordable screening mammography: current status.
    Stelling CB
    Appl Radiol; 1988 Feb; 17(2):37-9, 43. PubMed ID: 10286330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 116. Enhancing mammography use in the inner city. A randomized trial of intensive case management.
    Weber BE; Reilly BM
    Arch Intern Med; 1997 Nov; 157(20):2345-9. PubMed ID: 9361575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 117. The effect of a comprehensive breast screening program on self-reported mammography use by primary care physicians and women in a health maintenance organization.
    Rimer BK; Ross E; Balshem A; Engstrom PF
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1993; 6(5):443-51. PubMed ID: 8213234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 118. Economic Evaluation of Tailored Web versus Tailored Telephone-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening among Women.
    Lairson DR; Chung TH; Huang D; Stump TE; Monahan PO; Christy SM; Rawl SM; Champion VL
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2020 Mar; 13(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 31969343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 119. The impact of reminder-recall interventions on low vaccination coverage in an inner-city population.
    LeBaron CW; Starnes DM; Rask KJ
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2004 Mar; 158(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 14993085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 120. Implementation issues and costs associated with a proven strategy for increasing breast and cervical cancer screening among low-income women.
    Lantz PM; Stencil D; Lippert MT; Jaros L; Eaker ED
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 1996; 2(3):54-9. PubMed ID: 10186680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.