These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15671706)

  • 121. Factors affecting participation in a mammography screening program among members of an urban Detroit health maintenance organization.
    Simon MS; Gimotty PA; Coombs J; McBride S; Moncrease A; Burack RC
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1998; 22(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 9466046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 122. Use of a clinician reminder system for screening mammography in a public health clinic.
    Kohatsu ND; Cramer E; Bohnstedt M
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 7880554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 123. Enhancing the use of mammography: effectiveness and cost.
    Rimer BK; Lipscomb J
    Eff Clin Pract; 2000; 3(5):250-5. PubMed ID: 11185331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 124. Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.
    Buist DSM; Gao H; Anderson ML; Onega T; Brandzel S; Rabelhofer MA; Bradford SC; Aiello Bowles EJ
    Prev Med; 2017 Sep; 102():49-58. PubMed ID: 28655547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 125. The effects of mailed reminders and tailored messages on mammography screening.
    McCaul KD; Wold KS
    J Community Health; 2002 Jun; 27(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 12027268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 126. Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans.
    Vernon SW; del Junco DJ; Tiro JA; Coan SP; Perz CA; Bastian LA; Rakowski W; Chan W; Lairson DR; McQueen A; Fernandez ME; Warrick C; Halder A; DiClemente C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):347-58. PubMed ID: 18314474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 127. Effects of a mammography decision-making intervention at 12 and 24 months.
    Rimer BK; Halabi S; Sugg Skinner C; Lipkus IM; Strigo TS; Kaplan EB; Samsa GP
    Am J Prev Med; 2002 May; 22(4):247-57. PubMed ID: 11988381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 128. Personalized Mammography Screening and Screening Adherence-A Simulation and Economic Evaluation.
    Arnold M; Quante AS
    Value Health; 2018 Jul; 21(7):799-808. PubMed ID: 30005752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 129. Recruitment to mammography screening: a randomised trial and meta-analysis of invitation letters and telephone calls.
    Page A; Morrell S; Chiu C; Taylor R; Tewson R
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2006 Apr; 30(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 16681329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 130. Overcoming Barriers to Mammography Screening: A Quasi-randomised Pragmatic Trial in a Community-based Primary Care Setting.
    Seetoh T; Siew WF; Koh A; Liau WF; Koh GC; Lee JJ; Wong ML; Seow A
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2014 Dec; 43(12):588-94. PubMed ID: 25588917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 131. Promoting mammography: results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention.
    Costanza ME; Stoddard AM; Luckmann R; White MJ; Spitz Avrunin J; Clemow L
    Am J Prev Med; 2000 Jul; 19(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 10865162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 132. Evaluation of an intervention designed to recruit Canadian women to mammography screening.
    Hanson K; Montgomery P; Bakker D; Conlon M
    J Community Health Nurs; 2011 Jul; 28(3):130-43. PubMed ID: 21809929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 133. Introductory postcards: do they increase response rate in a telephone survey of older persons?
    Iredell H; Shaw T; Howat P; James R; Granich J
    Health Educ Res; 2004 Apr; 19(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 15031275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 134. Tailored interventions for screening mammography among a sample of initially non-adherent women: when is a booster dose important?
    Skinner CS; Kobrin SC; Monahan PO; Daggy J; Menon U; Todora HS; Champion VL
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jan; 65(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 16872787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 135. Patient reminder letters to promote annual mammograms: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mayer JA; Lewis EC; Slymen DJ; Dullum J; Kurata H; Holbrook A; Elder JP; Williams SJ
    Prev Med; 2000 Oct; 31(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 11006056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 136. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities.
    Andersen MR; Hager M; Su C; Urban N
    Health Educ Behav; 2002 Dec; 29(6):755-70. PubMed ID: 12456132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 137. Effectiveness of telephone prompts when surveying general practitioners: a randomised trial.
    Osborn M; Ward J; Boyle C
    Aust Fam Physician; 1996 Jan; Suppl 1():S41-3. PubMed ID: 9479799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 138. Does intervention by an allied health professional discussing adherence to medicines improve this adherence in Type 2 diabetes?
    Doggrell SA
    Diabet Med; 2010 Dec; 27(12):1341-9. PubMed ID: 21059085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 139. [Phone prompt or mailed reminder for increasing response rate among investigators? A randomized trial in the Sentinelles network].
    Czernichow S; Flahault A
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2001 Feb; 49(1):93-4. PubMed ID: 11226922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 140. The use of patient and physician reminders for preventive services: results from a National Study of Physician Organizations.
    Schmittdiel J; McMenamin SB; Halpin HA; Gillies RR; Bodenheimer T; Shortell SM; Rundall T; Casalino LP
    Prev Med; 2004 Nov; 39(5):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15475035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.