315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15672062)
1. Noninvasive vs. selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis.
Romagnuolo J; Currie G;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Jan; 61(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 15672062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model.
Arguedas MR; Dupont AW; Wilcox CM
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2892-9. PubMed ID: 11693323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis.
Şurlin V; Săftoiu A; Dumitrescu D
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 20(44):16544-9. PubMed ID: 25469022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Making cost-effectiveness analyses clinically relevant: the effect of provider expertise and biliary disease prevalence on the economic comparison of alternative diagnostic strategies.
Carlos RC; Scheiman JM; Hussain HK; Song JH; Francis IR; Fendrick AM
Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):620-30. PubMed ID: 12809415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.
Lee SL; Kim HK; Choi HH; Jeon BS; Kim TH; Choi JM; Ku YM; Kim SW; Kim SS; Chae HS
Pancreatology; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29246689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones.
Morris S; Gurusamy KS; Sheringham J; Davidson BR
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121699. PubMed ID: 25799113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Controversial issues in biliary pancreatitis: when should we perform MRCP and ERCP?
Cavdar F; Yildar M; Tellioğlu G; Kara M; Tilki M; Titiz Mİ
Pancreatology; 2014; 14(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 25200693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US.
Moon JH; Cho YD; Cha SW; Cheon YK; Ahn HC; Kim YS; Kim YS; Lee JS; Lee MS; Lee HK; Shim CS; Kim BS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15842578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The timing of ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis.
Svatoň R; Kala Z; Novotný I; Trna J; Andrašina T; Kunovsky L
Rozhl Chir; 2019; 98(1):10-13. PubMed ID: 30781960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliary abnormalities in postcholecystectomy patients: a probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies.
Howard K; Lord SJ; Speer A; Gibson RN; Padbury R; Kearney B
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 16673687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review.
De Lisi S; Leandro G; Buscarini E
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 May; 23(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 21487299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy.
NIH Consens State Sci Statements; 2002 Jan 14-16; 19(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 14768653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic yield of ERCP and secretin-enhanced MRCP and EUS in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis of unknown aetiology.
Mariani A; Arcidiacono PG; Curioni S; Giussani A; Testoni PA
Dig Liver Dis; 2009 Oct; 41(10):753-8. PubMed ID: 19278909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role and timing of endoscopy in acute biliary pancreatitis.
Anderloni A; Repici A
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 21(40):11205-8. PubMed ID: 26527465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early EUS of the bile duct before endoscopic sphincterotomy for acute biliary pancreatitis.
Prat F; Edery J; Meduri B; Chiche R; Ayoun C; Bodart M; Grange D; Loison F; Nedelec P; Sbai-Idrissi MS; Valverde A; Vergeau B
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Dec; 54(6):724-9. PubMed ID: 11726848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison Costs of ERCP and MRCP in Patients with Suspected Biliary Obstruction Based on a Randomized Trial.
Adam V; Bhat M; Martel M; da Silveira E; Reinhold C; Valois E; Barkun JS; Barkun AN
Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 26409603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic approach to acute pancreatitis.
Kinney TP; Lai R; Freeman ML
Rev Gastroenterol Disord; 2006; 6(3):119-35. PubMed ID: 16957653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Diagnostic value of MRCP in biliary pancreatitis: result of long-term follow-up".
Okan I; Bas G; Sahin M; Alimoglu O; Eryilmaz R; Ozkan OV; Hasiloglu ZI; Akcakaya A
Acta Chir Belg; 2012; 112(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 23175924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.
Mofidi R; Lee AC; Madhavan KK; Garden OJ; Parks RW
Pancreatology; 2008; 8(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18253063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]