These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15672062)
1. Noninvasive vs. selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis. Romagnuolo J; Currie G; Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Jan; 61(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 15672062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model. Arguedas MR; Dupont AW; Wilcox CM Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2892-9. PubMed ID: 11693323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis. Şurlin V; Săftoiu A; Dumitrescu D World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 20(44):16544-9. PubMed ID: 25469022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Making cost-effectiveness analyses clinically relevant: the effect of provider expertise and biliary disease prevalence on the economic comparison of alternative diagnostic strategies. Carlos RC; Scheiman JM; Hussain HK; Song JH; Francis IR; Fendrick AM Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):620-30. PubMed ID: 12809415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis. Lee SL; Kim HK; Choi HH; Jeon BS; Kim TH; Choi JM; Ku YM; Kim SW; Kim SS; Chae HS Pancreatology; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29246689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Morris S; Gurusamy KS; Sheringham J; Davidson BR PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121699. PubMed ID: 25799113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Controversial issues in biliary pancreatitis: when should we perform MRCP and ERCP? Cavdar F; Yildar M; Tellioğlu G; Kara M; Tilki M; Titiz Mİ Pancreatology; 2014; 14(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 25200693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US. Moon JH; Cho YD; Cha SW; Cheon YK; Ahn HC; Kim YS; Kim YS; Lee JS; Lee MS; Lee HK; Shim CS; Kim BS Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15842578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The timing of ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis. Svatoň R; Kala Z; Novotný I; Trna J; Andrašina T; Kunovsky L Rozhl Chir; 2019; 98(1):10-13. PubMed ID: 30781960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliary abnormalities in postcholecystectomy patients: a probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies. Howard K; Lord SJ; Speer A; Gibson RN; Padbury R; Kearney B Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 16673687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. De Lisi S; Leandro G; Buscarini E Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 May; 23(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 21487299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consens State Sci Statements; 2002 Jan 14-16; 19(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 14768653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic yield of ERCP and secretin-enhanced MRCP and EUS in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis of unknown aetiology. Mariani A; Arcidiacono PG; Curioni S; Giussani A; Testoni PA Dig Liver Dis; 2009 Oct; 41(10):753-8. PubMed ID: 19278909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role and timing of endoscopy in acute biliary pancreatitis. Anderloni A; Repici A World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 21(40):11205-8. PubMed ID: 26527465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early EUS of the bile duct before endoscopic sphincterotomy for acute biliary pancreatitis. Prat F; Edery J; Meduri B; Chiche R; Ayoun C; Bodart M; Grange D; Loison F; Nedelec P; Sbai-Idrissi MS; Valverde A; Vergeau B Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Dec; 54(6):724-9. PubMed ID: 11726848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison Costs of ERCP and MRCP in Patients with Suspected Biliary Obstruction Based on a Randomized Trial. Adam V; Bhat M; Martel M; da Silveira E; Reinhold C; Valois E; Barkun JS; Barkun AN Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 26409603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic approach to acute pancreatitis. Kinney TP; Lai R; Freeman ML Rev Gastroenterol Disord; 2006; 6(3):119-35. PubMed ID: 16957653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Diagnostic value of MRCP in biliary pancreatitis: result of long-term follow-up". Okan I; Bas G; Sahin M; Alimoglu O; Eryilmaz R; Ozkan OV; Hasiloglu ZI; Akcakaya A Acta Chir Belg; 2012; 112(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 23175924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis. Mofidi R; Lee AC; Madhavan KK; Garden OJ; Parks RW Pancreatology; 2008; 8(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18253063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]