These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15672824)

  • 1. The geometric module in the rat: independence of shape and feature learning in a food finding task.
    Wall PL; Botly LC; Black CK; Shettleworth SJ
    Learn Behav; 2004 Aug; 32(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 15672824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generalization in place learning across geometrically different environments is impaired by hippocampal lesions in rats.
    Tommasi L; Save E
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2005 Jul; 84(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15936678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geometry learning while navigating: The importance of task difficulty and sex differences.
    Chamizo VD; Urrutia M; Sánchez O; Calabrese MD; Riccio O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(4):470-483. PubMed ID: 32406715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generalization in place learning and geometry knowledge in rats.
    Tommasi L; Thinus-Blanc C
    Learn Mem; 2004; 11(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 15054130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment.
    Pearce JM; Graham M; Good MA; Jones PM; McGregor A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):201-14. PubMed ID: 16834489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Size does not matter, but features do: Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) weigh features more heavily than geometry in large and small enclosures.
    Lambinet V; Wilzeck C; Kelly DM
    Behav Processes; 2014 Feb; 102():3-11. PubMed ID: 24378211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competition among spatial cues in a naturalistic food-carrying task.
    Gibson BM; Shettleworth SJ
    Learn Behav; 2003 May; 31(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 12882373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reorienting when cues conflict: A role for information content in spatial learning?
    Sturz BR; Diemer SM
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jan; 83(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 19903512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spared feature-structure discrimination but diminished salience of environmental geometry in hippocampal-lesioned homing pigeons (Columba livia).
    Bingman VP; Erichsen JT; Anderson JD; Good MA; Pearce JM
    Behav Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 120(4):835-41. PubMed ID: 16893289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial reorientation in rats (Rattus norvegicus): use of geometric and featural information as a function of arena size and feature location.
    Maes JH; Fontanari L; Regolin L
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 201(2):285-91. PubMed ID: 19428646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Latent spatial learning in an environment with a distinctive shape.
    Horne MR; Gilroy KE; Cuell SF; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 22369200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asymmetrical participation of the left and right hippocampus for representing environmental geometry in homing pigeons.
    Nardi D; Bingman VP
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 178(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 17215051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 19576273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence of a relational spatial strategy in learning the centre of enclosures in human children (Homo sapiens).
    Tommasi L; Giuliano A
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():172-9. PubMed ID: 24954553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Slope-driven goal location behavior in pigeons.
    Nardi D; Nitsch KP; Bingman VP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):430-42. PubMed ID: 20718551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What do rats learn about the geometry of object arrays? Tests with exploratory behavior.
    Skov-Rackette SI; Shettleworth SJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Apr; 31(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 15839772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overshadowing and blocking between landmark learning and shape learning: the importance of sex differences.
    Rodríguez CA; Chamizo VD; Mackintosh NJ
    Learn Behav; 2011 Dec; 39(4):324-35. PubMed ID: 21472414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information.
    Chiandetti C; Regolin L; Sovrano VA; Vallortigara G
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 17136416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enclosure size and the use of local and global geometric cues for reorientation.
    Sturz BR; Forloines MR; Bodily KD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 22218783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Further evidence that rats rely on local rather than global spatial information to locate a hidden goal: reply to Cheng and Gallistel (2005).
    McGregor A; Jones PM; Good MA; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):314-21. PubMed ID: 16834498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.