These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15672827)

  • 1. Acquisition with partial and continuous reinforcement in pigeon autoshaping.
    Gottlieb DA
    Learn Behav; 2004 Aug; 32(3):321-34. PubMed ID: 15672827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of partial reinforcement and time between reinforced trials on terminal response rate in pigeon autoshaping.
    Gottlieb DA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 16413974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acquisition with partial and continuous reinforcement in rat magazine approach.
    Gottlieb DA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):319-33. PubMed ID: 16045386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Importance of trials versus accumulating time across trials in partially reinforced appetitive conditioning.
    Bouton ME; Sunsay C
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):62-77. PubMed ID: 12561134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hippocampal lesions and associative learning in the pigeon.
    Reilly S; Good M
    Behav Neurosci; 1989 Aug; 103(4):731-42. PubMed ID: 2765178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Duration of signals for intertrial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in random control procedures.
    Cooper LD; Aronson L; Balsam PD; Gibbon J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 2303790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pavlovian contingencies and temporal information.
    Balsam PD; Fairhurst S; Gallistel CR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):284-94. PubMed ID: 16834495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contextual control of appetitive conditioning: influence of a contextual stimulus generated by a partial reinforcement procedure.
    Bouton ME; Sunsay C
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2001 May; 54(2):109-25. PubMed ID: 11393934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Competition between stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and anticipatory contrast.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 1402603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of contextual associations in producing the partial reinforcement acquisition deficit.
    Miguez G; Witnauer JE; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 21707201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The sequencing of trials during partial reinforcement affects subsequent extinction.
    Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2024 Jan; 50(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 37930638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Autoshaping the pigeon's gape response: acquisition and topography as a function of reinforcer type and magnitude.
    Allan RW; Zeigler HP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Sep; 62(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 7964365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responses eliminated by noncontingent or negatively contingent reinforcement recover in extinction.
    Lindblom LL; Jenkins HM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):175-90. PubMed ID: 7241053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative durations of conditioned stimulus and intertrial interval in conditioned suppression.
    Coleman DA; Hemmes NS; Brown BL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jul; 46(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 3746188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace.
    Pearce JM; Redhead ES; George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid contextual conditioning in autoshaping.
    Balsam PD; Schwartz AL
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Oct; 7(4):382-93. PubMed ID: 7288369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.
    Lieving GA; Reilly MP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17002227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates.
    Bai JYH; Podlesnik CA
    Behav Processes; 2017 May; 138():29-33. PubMed ID: 28216120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extinction of Pavlovian conditioning: The influence of trial number and reinforcement history.
    Chan CKJ; Harris JA
    Behav Processes; 2017 Aug; 141(Pt 1):19-25. PubMed ID: 28473250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unequal associative changes when excitors and neutral stimuli are conditioned in compound.
    Rescorla RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2001 Feb; 54(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 11216301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.