308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15673134)
1. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study.
Guest SS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 21055598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment effects produced by preorthodontic trainer appliance in patients with class II division I malocclusion.
Das UM; Reddy D
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 20215669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients. Hyrax versus transverse sagittal maxillary expander: a cephalometric investigation.
Farronato G; Maspero C; Esposito L; Briguglio E; Farronato D; Giannini L
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 21059876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentoskeletal effects of a removable appliance for expansion of the maxillary arch: a postero-anterior cephalometric study.
Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Tollaro I
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17971351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
Aslan BI; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Class II malocclusion with maxillary protrusion from the deciduous through the mixed dentition: a longitudinal study.
Antonini A; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Franchi L; Defraia E
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 16448241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite: a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Masucci C; Vangelisti A; Defraia E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22748993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
