These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15673184)

  • 1. Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Arrington CM; Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Sep; 32(6):965-78. PubMed ID: 15673184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Very clever homunculus: compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Logan GD; Bundesen C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Oct; 11(5):832-40. PubMed ID: 15732691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Priming or executive control? Associative priming of cue encoding increases "switch costs" in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1250-9. PubMed ID: 17225506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?
    Logan GD; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Jun; 29(3):575-99. PubMed ID: 12848327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition.
    Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature Integration and Task Switching: Diminished Switch Costs after Controlling for Stimulus, Response, and Cue Repetitions.
    Schmidt JR; Liefooghe B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151188. PubMed ID: 26964102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 16724782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?
    Forrest CL; Monsell S; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1002-24. PubMed ID: 24564543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the functional significance of retrieval mode: Task switching disrupts the recollection of conceptual stimulus information from episodic memory.
    Küper K
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1678():1-11. PubMed ID: 28986084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is it harder to switch among a larger set of tasks?
    van 't Wout F; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):363-76. PubMed ID: 25528089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Components of task switching: a closer look at task switching and cue switching.
    Schmitz F; Voss A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():184-96. PubMed ID: 25004102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From N400 to N300: variations in the timing of semantic processing with repetition.
    Renoult L; Wang X; Calcagno V; Prévost M; Debruille JB
    Neuroimage; 2012 May; 61(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 22406358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The "one-shot" hypothesis for context storage.
    Malmberg KJ; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):322-36. PubMed ID: 15755248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness?
    Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):455-72. PubMed ID: 20853997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?
    Altmann EM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Still clever after all these years: searching for the homunculus in explicitly cued task switching.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):978-94. PubMed ID: 17683241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Updating sensory versus task representations during task-switching: insights from cognitive brain potentials in humans.
    Periáñez JA; Barceló F
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):1160-72. PubMed ID: 19350711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.