These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15674226)

  • 1. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite.
    Clelland NL; Pagnotto MP; Kerby RE; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 15674226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulated oral wear of packable composites.
    Clelland NL; Villarroel SC; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 14653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives.
    Suzuki S; Nagai E; Taira Y; Minesaki Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 12447221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials.
    Yesil ZD; Alapati S; Johnston W; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):435-43. PubMed ID: 18514665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro wear of packable dental composites.
    Ferracane JL; Choi KK; Condon JR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (25):S60-6; quiz S74. PubMed ID: 11908398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-body wear resistance and degree of conversion of laboratory-processed composite materials.
    Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Seghi R; van Putten M
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 10709525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An up to 3-year randomized clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin composites used to restore worn posterior teeth.
    Bartlett D; Sundaram G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 17165303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion.
    Tanoue N; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 10898845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of temperature on unpolymerized composite resin film thickness.
    Blalock JS; Holmes RG; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 17174660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Localized three-body wear of resin composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():19-27. PubMed ID: 8935090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of OCA wear resistance of posterior composites.
    Kawai K; Leinfelder KF
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jul; 11(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 8621046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material.
    Hahnel S; Behr M; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19328280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler.
    Lu H; Lee YK; Oguri M; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):734-40. PubMed ID: 17153985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment.
    Condon JR; Ferracane JL
    J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1405-11. PubMed ID: 9207774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators--results of a round robin test.
    Heintze SD; Zappini G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):304-17. PubMed ID: 15766577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hardness comparison of bulk-filled/transtooth and incremental-filled/occlusally irradiated composite resins.
    Lazarchik DA; Hammond BD; Sikes CL; Looney SW; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 17692594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.