182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15674317)
1. Population coverage and nonresponse bias in a large-scale human exposure study.
Mosquin P; Whitmore R; Suerken C; Quackenboss J
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 15(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 15674317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Population-based exposure measurements in EPA region 5: a phase I field study in support of the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey.
Pellizzari E; Lioy P; Quackenboss J; Whitmore R; Clayton A; Freeman N; Waldman J; Thomas K; Rodes C; Wilcosky T
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1995; 5(3):327-58. PubMed ID: 8814775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adjusting for nonresponse bias in a health examination survey.
Rowland ML; Forthofer RN
Public Health Rep; 1993; 108(3):380-6. PubMed ID: 8497577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Addressing nonresponse bias in postal surveys.
MacDonald SE; Newburn-Cook CV; Schopflocher D; Richter S
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 19154197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Compensating for provider nonresponse using response propensities to form adjustment cells: the National Immunization Survey.
Smith PJ; Rao JN; Battaglia MP; Ezzati-Rice TM; Daniels D; Khare M;
Vital Health Stat 2; 2001 Oct; (133):1-17. PubMed ID: 15791761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying bias in a health survey: modeling total survey error in the national immunization survey.
Molinari NM; Wolter KM; Skalland B; Montgomery R; Khare M; Smith PJ; Barron ML; Copeland K; Santos K; Singleton JA
Stat Med; 2011 Feb; 30(5):505-14. PubMed ID: 21294147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjustments for non-telephone bias in random-digit-dialling surveys.
Frankel MR; Srinath KP; Hoaglin DC; Battaglia MP; Smith PJ; Wright RA; Khare M
Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1611-26. PubMed ID: 12704619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences between RDD telephone and ABS mail survey design: coverage, unit nonresponse, and measurement error.
Peytchev A; Ridenhour J; Krotki K
J Health Commun; 2010; 15 Suppl 3():117-34. PubMed ID: 21154088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonresponse bias and cost-effectiveness in a Norwegian survey of family physicians.
Bjertnaes OA; Garratt A; Botten G
Eval Health Prof; 2008 Mar; 31(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 18174607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Geographic Information System mapping as a tool to assess nonresponse bias in survey research.
Hansen RA; Henley AC; Brouwer ES; Oraefo AN; Roth MT
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Sep; 3(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 17945157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response rate and nonresponse bias in a questionnaire survey of dentists.
Parashos P; Morgan MV; Messer HH
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 33(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 15642042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On weighting the rates in non-response weights.
Little RJ; Vartivarian S
Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1589-99. PubMed ID: 12704617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mixed-mode administration reduced bias and enhanced poststratification adjustments in a health behavior survey.
Baines AD; Partin MR; Davern M; Rockwood TH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1246-55. PubMed ID: 17998079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonresponse error in injury-risk surveys.
Johnson TP; Holbrook AL; Ik Cho Y; Bossarte RM
Am J Prev Med; 2006 Nov; 31(5):427-36. PubMed ID: 17046415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonresponse bias in a mail survey of physicians.
McFarlane E; Olmsted MG; Murphy J; Hill CA
Eval Health Prof; 2007 Jun; 30(2):170-85. PubMed ID: 17476029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating nonresponse bias in a telephone-based health surveillance survey in New York City.
Lim S; Immerwahr S; Lee S; Harris TG
Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 178(8):1337-41. PubMed ID: 23985129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Handling nonresponse in surveys: analytic corrections compared with converting nonresponders.
Jenkins P; Earle-Richardson G; Burdick P; May J
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 167(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 17998277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Overview of important design issues for a National Human Exposure Assessment Survey.
Callahan MA; Clickner RP; Whitmore RW; Kalton G; Sexton K
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1995; 5(3):257-82. PubMed ID: 8814772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prolonged recruitment efforts in health surveys: effects on response, costs, and potential bias.
Holle R; Hochadel M; Reitmeir P; Meisinger C; Wichmann HE;
Epidemiology; 2006 Nov; 17(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 17003684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
