These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15676311)

  • 1. Gender differences in performance of a selection test using the incremental lifting machine.
    Stevenson JM; Greenhorn DR; Bryant JT; Deakin JM; Smith JT
    Appl Ergon; 1996 Feb; 27(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 15676311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic analysis of isoinertial lifting technique.
    Stevenson JM; Bryant JT; French SL; Greenhorn DR; Andrew GM; Thomson JM
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 28080938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Isoinertial tests to predict lifting performance.
    Stevenson JM; Andrew GM; Bryant JT; Greenhorn DR; Thomson JM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Feb; 32(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 2714247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of lifting protocol on comparisons with isoinertial lifting performance.
    Stevenson J; Bryant T; Greenhorn D; Smith T; Deakin J; Surgenor B
    Ergonomics; 1990 Dec; 33(12):1455-69. PubMed ID: 2286194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of factor-score-based models to explain and predict maximal box-lifting performance.
    Stevenson J; Bryant T; Greenhorn D; Deakin J; Smith T
    Ergonomics; 1995 Feb; 38(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 7895736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Four factor model to describe an isoinertial lift.
    Bryant JT; Stevenson JM; French SL; Greenhorn DR; M Andrew G; Deakin JM
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):173-186. PubMed ID: 28080946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple anthropometric and physical performance tests to predict maximal box-lifting ability.
    Williams AG; Wilkinson M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 May; 21(2):638-42. PubMed ID: 17530955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictors of Military Task Performance: Maximal Lift Capacity.
    Hydren JR; Borges AS; Sharp MA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1142-1164. PubMed ID: 28135227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The sensitivity of a military-based occupational fitness test of muscular strength.
    Middleton KJ; Carstairs GL; Caldwell JN; Billing DC; Beck B
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():255-259. PubMed ID: 28166884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysical modelling of lifting capacity of Chinese males using strength variables.
    Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Appl Ergon; 1993 Aug; 24(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 15676920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can simple anthropometric and physical performance tests track training-induced changes in maximal box-lifting ability?
    Williams AG; Rayson MP
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):661-70. PubMed ID: 16720527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of a fatiguing lifting task on postural sway among males and females.
    Bannon HM; Hakansson NA; Jakobsen MD; Sundstrup E; Jorgensen MJ
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Jun; 59():193-200. PubMed ID: 29704790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex differences in lifting strategies during a repetitive palletizing task.
    Plamondon A; Larivière C; Denis D; St-Vincent M; Delisle A;
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1558-69. PubMed ID: 24931477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of task resistance on the characteristics of maximal one- and two-handed lifting exertions in men and women.
    Fothergill DM; Grieve DW; Pinder AD
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1996; 72(5-6):430-9. PubMed ID: 8925813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationships among lifting ability, grip force, and return to work.
    Matheson LN; Isernhagen SJ; Hart DL
    Phys Ther; 2002 Mar; 82(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 11869153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of EMG time-frequency measures of fatigue during repetitive lifting.
    Ebenbichler GR; Bonato P; Roy SH; Lehr S; Posch M; Kollmitzer J; Della Croce U
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Aug; 34(8):1316-23. PubMed ID: 12165687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of body position on isometric arm lifting strength.
    Lin JH; Sun TY; Lee CH
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 1996 Feb; 12(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 8709179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.
    Bonato P; Ebenbichler GR; Roy SH; Lehr S; Posch M; Kollmitzer J; Della Croce U
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1810-20. PubMed ID: 12923468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.