These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15677355)

  • 21. Unwrapping of MR phase images using a Markov random field model.
    Ying L; Liang ZP; Munson DC; Koetter R; Frey BJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Jan; 25(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 16398421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Statistical properties of Jacobian maps and the realization of unbiased large-deformation nonlinear image registration.
    Leow AD; Yanovsky I; Chiang MC; Lee AD; Klunder AD; Lu A; Becker JT; Davis SW; Toga AW; Thompson PM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 17679333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unifying framework for multimodal brain MRI segmentation based on Hidden Markov Chains.
    Bricq S; Collet Ch; Armspach JP
    Med Image Anal; 2008 Dec; 12(6):639-52. PubMed ID: 18440268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of MRI-based 3D digital atlas registration with histological and autoradiographic volumes: an anatomofunctional transgenic mouse brain imaging study.
    Lebenberg J; Hérard AS; Dubois A; Dauguet J; Frouin V; Dhenain M; Hantraye P; Delzescaux T
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jul; 51(3):1037-46. PubMed ID: 20226256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-dimensional representation of complex muscle architectures and geometries.
    Blemker SS; Delp SL
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 May; 33(5):661-73. PubMed ID: 15981866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Medical image interpretation: a generic approach using deformable templates.
    Hill A; Cootes TF; Taylor CJ; Lindley K
    Med Inform (Lond); 1994; 19(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 7934304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Statistical methods in computational anatomy.
    Miller M; Banerjee A; Christensen G; Joshi S; Khaneja N; Grenander U; Matejic L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1997 Sep; 6(3):267-99. PubMed ID: 9339500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Morphometry of anatomical shape complexes with dense deformations and sparse parameters.
    Durrleman S; Prastawa M; Charon N; Korenberg JR; Joshi S; Gerig G; Trouvé A
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():35-49. PubMed ID: 24973601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection and analysis of statistical differences in anatomical shape.
    Golland P; Grimson WE; Shenton ME; Kikinis R
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Feb; 9(1):69-86. PubMed ID: 15581813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Image analysis and modeling in medical image computing. Recent developments and advances.
    Handels H; Deserno TM; Meinzer HP; Tolxdorff T
    Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(5):395-7. PubMed ID: 23052259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Level set distribution model of nested structures using logarithmic transformation.
    Saito A; Tsujikawa M; Takakuwa T; Yamada S; Shimizu A
    Med Image Anal; 2019 Aug; 56():1-10. PubMed ID: 31125739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cinematic Rendering Technique in Adult Congenital Heart Disease.
    Fiorentino V; Goerne H; Rajiah P
    Semin Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 55(3):241-250. PubMed ID: 32859341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neuroscience models: choose your dimension.
    Marx V
    Nat Methods; 2018 Nov; 15(11):863-866. PubMed ID: 30377378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Synthetic images by subspace transforms. I. Principal components images and related filters.
    Sychra JJ; Bandettini PA; Bhattacharya N; Lin Q
    Med Phys; 1994 Feb; 21(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 8177152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Causality matters in medical imaging.
    Castro DC; Walker I; Glocker B
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3673. PubMed ID: 32699250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical shape modeling of pathological scoliotic vertebrae: A comparative analysis.
    de Oliveira ME; Reutlinger C; Zheng G; Hasler CC; Buchler P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():5939-42. PubMed ID: 21096944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of anatomic information in quantifying functional neuroimaging data.
    Bohm C; Greitz T; Thurfjell L
    J Neural Transm Suppl; 1992; 37():67-78. PubMed ID: 1402853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of longitudinal shape variability via subject specific growth modeling.
    Fishbaugh J; Prastawa M; Durrleman S; Piven J; Gerig G;
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 1):731-8. PubMed ID: 23285617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Utilizing three-dimensional data in orthodontic practice and research.
    Solem RC
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Jun; 20 Suppl 1():114-118. PubMed ID: 28643907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sparsity techniques in medical imaging.
    Fang R; Chen T; Metaxas D; Sanelli P; Zhang S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 1(Pt 1):1. PubMed ID: 26216851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.