These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15678225)

  • 1. Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.
    Chung K
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(3):83-124. PubMed ID: 15678225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of directional microphone and adaptive multichannel noise reduction algorithm on cochlear implant performance.
    Chung K; Zeng FG; Acker KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2216-27. PubMed ID: 17069317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Potential Benefits and Limitations of Noise-Management Technologies for Children with Hearing Aids.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Browning S; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 35512843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving Cochlear Implant Performance in the Wind Through Spectral Masking Release: A Multi-microphone and Multichannel Strategy.
    Chung K
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):420-432. PubMed ID: 31425361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Better speech perception in noise with an assistive multimicrophone array for hearing AIDS.
    Luts H; Maj JB; Soede W; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 15599189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss.
    McCreery RW; Venediktov RA; Coleman JJ; Leech HM
    Am J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 21(2):295-312. PubMed ID: 22858614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wind noise in hearing aids: II. Effect of microphone directivity.
    Chung K
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jan; 51(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 22111542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: I. Speech perception outcomes.
    Bentler R; Palmer C; Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Mar; 17(3):179-89. PubMed ID: 16646278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition and comfort using hearing instruments with adaptive directional characteristics in asymmetric listening conditions.
    Mackenzie E; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 16378001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of signal-to-noise ratio on directional microphone benefit and preference.
    Walden BE; Surr RK; Grant KW; Van Summers W; Cord MT; Dyrlund O
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):662-76. PubMed ID: 16515138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [New developments in hearing aid technology].
    Kompis M
    Ther Umsch; 2004 Jan; 61(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 14997998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; DeVries S; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):805-822. PubMed ID: 30379683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of array-processing algorithms for a headband hearing aid.
    Greenberg JE; Desloge JG; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1646-57. PubMed ID: 12656398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survey of Current Practice in the Fitting and Fine-Tuning of Common Signal-Processing Features in Hearing Aids for Adults.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Souza PE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):118-124. PubMed ID: 29401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.