These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15679274)

  • 1. The effectiveness of low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous emboli.
    Norman MJ; Sistino JJ; Acsell JR
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2004 Dec; 36(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 15679274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous microemboli?
    Jones TJ; Deal DD; Vernon JC; Blackburn N; Stump DA
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2002 Mar; 34(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 11911627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does vacuum-assisted venous drainage increase gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass?
    Jones TJ; Deal DD; Vernon JC; Blackburn N; Stump DA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2002 Dec; 74(6):2132-7. PubMed ID: 12643407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted venous drainage, venous air, and gaseous microemboli transmission into the arterial line: an in-vitro study.
    Rider SP; Simon LV; Rice BJ; Poulton CC
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 1998 Dec; 30(4):160-5. PubMed ID: 10537575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage: to air or not to air, that is the question. Has the bubble burst?
    Willcox TW
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2002 Mar; 34(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 11911625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical real-time monitoring of gaseous microemboli in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass.
    Wang S; Woitas K; Clark JB; Myers JL; Undar A
    Artif Organs; 2009 Nov; 33(11):1026-30. PubMed ID: 20021476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two different blood pumps on delivery of gaseous microemboli during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion in a simulated infant CPB model.
    Wang S; Kunselman AR; Myers JL; Undar A
    ASAIO J; 2008; 54(5):538-41. PubMed ID: 18812749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Air removal capacity of two different minimal invasive ECC systems: an in vitro comparison.
    Stehouwer MC; de Vroege R
    Perfusion; 2019 Oct; 34(7):561-567. PubMed ID: 30915891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of oxygenator characteristics on its capability to remove gaseous microemboli.
    De Somer F
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2007 Dec; 39(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 18293817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gaseous microemboli detection in a simulated pediatric CPB circuit using a novel ultrasound system.
    Miller A; Wang S; Myers JL; Undar A
    ASAIO J; 2008; 54(5):504-8. PubMed ID: 18812742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection and classification of gaseous microemboli during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion in a simulated neonatal CPB model.
    Undar A; Ji B; Kunselman AR; Myers JL
    ASAIO J; 2007; 53(6):725-9. PubMed ID: 18043156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gaseous microemboli in a pediatric bypass circuit with an unprimed venous line: an in vitro study.
    Hudacko A; Sievert A; Sistino J
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2009 Sep; 41(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 19806800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage and gaseous microemboli in cardiopulmonary bypass.
    Wang S; Undar A
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2008 Dec; 40(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 19192754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compact extracorporeal circulation: reducing the surface of cardiopulmonary bypass to improve outcomes.
    Borrelli U; Al-Attar N; Detroux M; Nottin R; Nikis S; Jennes S; Nackers P; Baert G; Colinet B; Miesse C; Fijakowski J; Perron F
    Surg Technol Int; 2007; 16():159-66. PubMed ID: 17429784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Venous air in the bypass circuit: a source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum-assisted drainage.
    Willcox TW; Mitchell SJ; Gorman DF
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Oct; 68(4):1285-9. PubMed ID: 10543494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of the air separation ability of four cardiovascular manufacturer extracorporeal circuit designs.
    Dickinson TA; Riley JB; Crowley JC; Zabetakis PM
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2006 Sep; 38(3):206-13. PubMed ID: 17089505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does CO(2) flushing of the empty CPB circuit decrease the number of gaseous emboli in the prime?
    Nyman J; Rundby C; Svenarud P; van der Linden J
    Perfusion; 2009 Jul; 24(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 19864467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blood temperature management and gaseous microemboli creation: an in-vitro analysis.
    Sleep J; Syhre I; Evans E
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2010 Sep; 42(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 21114225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro evaluation of Capiox FX05 and RX05 oxygenators in neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass circuits with varying venous reservoir and vacuum-assisted venous drainage levels.
    Sathianathan S; Nasir R; Wang S; Kunselman AR; Ündar A
    Artif Organs; 2020 Jan; 44(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 30512218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of gaseous microemboli counts in arterial, simultaneous and venous heat exchange with a hollow fiber membrane oxygenator.
    Sutton RG; Riley JB; Merrill JH
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 1994; 26(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 10147369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.