BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15680144)

  • 1. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?
    Kraljic T; Brennan SE
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):194-231. PubMed ID: 15680144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue?
    Haywood SL; Pickering MJ; Branigan HP
    Psychol Sci; 2005 May; 16(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 15869694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perspective-Taking in Referential Communication: Does Stimulated Attention to Addressees' Perspective Influence Speakers' Reference Production?
    Damen D; van der Wijst P; van Amelsvoort M; Krahmer E
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):257-288. PubMed ID: 30219958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices.
    Lockridge CB; Brennan SE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Sep; 9(3):550-7. PubMed ID: 12412896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Untrained speakers' use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation and listeners' interpretations.
    Tree JE; Meijer PJ
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10743382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue.
    Branigan HP; Pickering MJ; McLean JF; Cleland AA
    Cognition; 2007 Aug; 104(2):163-97. PubMed ID: 16876778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speakers' overestimation of their effectiveness.
    Keysar B; Henly AS
    Psychol Sci; 2002 May; 13(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 12009039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonological phrase boundaries constrain the online syntactic analysis of spoken sentences.
    Millotte S; René A; Wales R; Christophe A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):874-85. PubMed ID: 18605875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural substrates of linguistic prosody: evidence from syntactic disambiguation in the productions of brain-damaged patients.
    Shah AP; Baum SR; Dwivedi VD
    Brain Lang; 2006 Jan; 96(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 15922444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic and perceptual cues to contrastive stress in dysarthria.
    Patel R; Campellone P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):206-22. PubMed ID: 18695019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prosodic temporal alignment of co-speech gestures to speech facilitates referent resolution.
    Jesse A; Johnson EK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1567-81. PubMed ID: 22545598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity.
    Allbritton DW; McKoon G; Ratcliff R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 May; 22(3):714-35. PubMed ID: 8656153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension.
    Schafer AJ; Speer SR; Warren P; White SD
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2000 Mar; 29(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 10709182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of shared knowledge on speakers' prosody.
    Michelas A; Cau C; Champagne-Lavau M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223640. PubMed ID: 31609982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lost in thought: cognitive load and the processing of addressees' feedback in verbal communication.
    Rossnagel CS
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 15267127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prosodic predictors of upcoming positive or negative content in spoken messages.
    Swerts M; Hirschberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1337-45. PubMed ID: 20815468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Timing of Syntactic and Rhythmic Effects on Ambiguity Resolution in Turkish: A Phoneme Restoration Study.
    Deniz ND; Fodor JD
    Lang Speech; 2020 Dec; 63(4):832-855. PubMed ID: 31868561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production.
    Ferreira VS; Dell GS
    Cogn Psychol; 2000 Jun; 40(4):296-340. PubMed ID: 10888342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation.
    Arnold JE; Kahn JM; Pancani GC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22419403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scope of lexical access in spoken sentence production: implications for the conceptual-syntactic interface.
    Allum PH; Wheeldon L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1240-55. PubMed ID: 19686018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.