These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1568027)
1. Left ventricular performance at rest and during exercise in patients with dual-chamber pacemakers. Kano K; Okada M; Tanahashi Y; Hayashi H; Yokota M; Saito H; Sotobata I Intern Med; 1992 Jan; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1568027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of heart rate response during exercise in patients using atrioventricular synchronous and ventricular pacemakers. McMeekin JD; Lautner D; Hanson S; Gulamhusein SS Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 1689036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays. Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative importance of activation sequence compared to atrioventricular synchrony in left ventricular function. Rosenqvist M; Isaaz K; Botvinick EH; Dae MW; Cockrell J; Abbott JA; Schiller NB; Griffin JC Am J Cardiol; 1991 Jan; 67(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 1987716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of maintenance of cardiac output during DDD and VVI pacing by exercise Doppler echocardiography]. Iwase M; Miyaguchi K; Aoki T; Kato K; Hatano K; Hayashi H; Yokota M; Takeuchi J; Maseki T; Murase M J Cardiol; 1991; 21(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 1843523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation by pulsed Doppler echocardiography of the atrial contribution to left ventricular filling in patients with DDD pacemakers. Iwase M; Sotobata I; Yokota M; Takagi S; Jing HX; Kawai N; Hayashi H; Murase M Am J Cardiol; 1986 Jul; 58(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 3728309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of the atrial contribution to ventricular filling in patients with DDD pacemakers]. Iwase M; Yokota M; Takagi S; Hu XJ; Okada M; Kawai N; Hayashi H; Sotobata I; Murase M J Cardiogr; 1985 Dec; 15(4):1225-36. PubMed ID: 3841903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation on left ventricular systolic synchronicity and cardiac function in patients with permanent cardiac pacing by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography]. Cai JF; Wang RX; Li XR; Dai M; Zhang CY; Liu XY; Qian DJ Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 38(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 20450562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of DDD and 'VVI-R like' pacing during moderate exercise: echo-Doppler study. Lascault G; Frank R; Iwa T; Girodo S; Fontaine G; Grosgogeat Y Eur Heart J; 1992 Jul; 13(7):914-7. PubMed ID: 1644081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost benefit analysis of single and dual chamber pacing for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. An economic sensitivity analysis of the literature. Sutton R; Bourgeois I Eur Heart J; 1996 Apr; 17(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8733091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Left atrial appendage function during DDD and VVI pacing. Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Zuridakis EG; Igoumenidis NE; Vardas PE Heart; 1997 May; 77(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 9196412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers. Lau CP; Wong CK; Leung WH; Liu WX Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. PubMed ID: 1704550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Higher sympathetic nerve activity during ventricular (VVI) than during dual-chamber (DDD) pacing. Taylor JA; Morillo CA; Eckberg DL; Ellenbogen KA J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Dec; 28(7):1753-8. PubMed ID: 8962562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single- versus dual-chamber sensor-driven pacing: comparison of cardiac outputs. Proctor EE; Leman RB; Mann DL; Kaiser J; Kratz J; Gillette P Am Heart J; 1991 Sep; 122(3 Pt 1):728-32. PubMed ID: 1877449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the early hemodynamic changes in carotid arteries during ventricular and dual chamber pacing. Soylu M; Ozdemir O; Geyik B; Ozbakir C; Demir AD; Duru E; Ozbal S; Hekimoglu B; Ozer T; Arda K Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Nov; 27(11):1540-4. PubMed ID: 15546310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DDD versus VVIR versus VVI mode in patients with indication to dual-chamber stimulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study. Moro E; Caprioglio F; Berton G; Marcon C; Riva U; Corbucci G; Delise P Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 16212074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Haemodynamic advantage with single chamber rate responsive pacemakers over dual chamber pacemakers during exercise in chronotropic incompetence. Maity AK; Ghosh SP; Dasbiswas A; Chatterjee SS; Chaudhury D; Das MK Indian Heart J; 1992; 44(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 1289220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac output in patients with physiologic pacemakers. Effects of left ventricular function and retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction. Stewart WJ; Dicola VC; Harthorne JW; Gillam LD; Weyman AE Am J Cardiol; 1984 Aug; 54(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 6465010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]