These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15680824)

  • 1. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement.
    Tasca G; Brunelli F; Cirillo M; DallaTomba M; Mhagna Z; Troise G; Quaini E
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Feb; 79(2):505-10. PubMed ID: 15680824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of the improvement of valve area achieved with aortic valve replacement on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with pure aortic stenosis.
    Tasca G; Brunelli F; Cirillo M; Dalla Tomba M; Mhagna Z; Troise G; Quaini E
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Apr; 79(4):1291-6; discussion 1296. PubMed ID: 15797064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly.
    Roscitano A; Benedetto U; Sciangula A; Merico E; Barberi F; Bianchini R; Tonelli E; Sinatra R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Feb; 29(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 16376565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of aortic prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression.
    Alassal MA; Ibrahim BM; Elsadeck N
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2014 Jun; 22(5):546-50. PubMed ID: 24867028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stentless and stented aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: Factors affecting midterm clinical and hemodynamical outcome.
    Bové T; Van Belleghem Y; François K; Caes F; Van Overbeke H; Van Nooten G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Nov; 30(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 16950630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regression in left ventricular mass after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation is unrelated to prosthetic valve size.
    Brown ML; Schaff HV; Suri RM; Li Z; Sundt TM; Dearani JA; Enriquez-Sarano M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Aug; 142(2):e5-9. PubMed ID: 21074186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival and left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Kato Y; Suehiro S; Shibata T; Sasaki Y; Hirai H
    J Card Surg; 2007; 22(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 17661773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Left ventricular mass regression after porcine versus bovine aortic valve replacement: a randomized comparison.
    Suri RM; Zehr KJ; Sundt TM; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Oh JK; Schaff HV
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Oct; 88(4):1232-7. PubMed ID: 19766812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient-prosthesis mismatch and left ventricular remodelling after implantation of Shelhigh SuperStentless aortic valve prostheses.
    Germing A; Lindstaedt M; Holt S; Reber D; Mügge A; Laczkovics A; Fritz M
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2008 Aug; 49(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 18665119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study.
    Dalmau MJ; González-Santos JM; Blázquez JA; Sastre JA; López-Rodríguez J; Bueno M; Castaño M; Arribas A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(6):844-52; discussion 852. PubMed ID: 21193320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable?
    Fuster RG; Montero Argudo JA; Albarova OG; Sos FH; López SC; Codoñer MB; Buendía Miñano JA; Albarran IR
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):441-9; discussion 449. PubMed ID: 15740953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Left ventricular mass regression is independent of gradient drop and effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement with a porcine bioprosthesis.
    Sádaba JR; Herregods MC; Bogaert J; Harringer W; Gerosa G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 23409363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhanced left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with improved long-term survival.
    Ali A; Patel A; Ali Z; Abu-Omar Y; Saeed A; Athanasiou T; Pepper J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Aug; 142(2):285-91. PubMed ID: 21272899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression.
    Ruel M; Al-Faleh H; Kulik A; Chan KL; Mesana TG; Burwash IG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1036-44. PubMed ID: 16678587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on intermediate-term outcome and regression of left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis.
    Tao K; Sakata R; Iguro Y; Ueno M; Tanaka Y; Otsuji Y; Tei C
    J Card Surg; 2007; 22(6):486-92. PubMed ID: 18039208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-year hemodynamic performance, left ventricular mass regression, and prosthetic-patient mismatch after rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in 287 patients.
    Haverich A; Wahlers TC; Borger MA; Shrestha M; Kocher AA; Walther T; Roth M; Misfeld M; Mohr FW; Kempfert J; Dohmen PM; Schmitz C; Rahmanian P; Wiedemann D; Duhay FG; Laufer G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 148(6):2854-60. PubMed ID: 25218544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of the increase in valve area after aortic valve replacement with a 19-mm aortic valve prosthesis on left ventricular mass regression in patients with pure aortic stenosis.
    Mhagna Z; Tasca G; Brunelli F; Cirillo M; Amaducci A; DallaTomba M; Troise G
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2006 May; 7(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 16645414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of 21-mm size perimount aortic bioprosthesis in the elderly.
    Bortolotti U; Scioti G; Milano A; De Carlo M; Codecasa R; Nardi C; Tartarini G
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2000 Jan; 69(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 10654484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stented bioprosthetic valve hemodynamics: is the supra-annular implant better than the intra-annular?
    Badano LP; Pavoni D; Musumeci S; Frassani R; Gianfagna P; Baldassi M; Tursi V; Mazzaro E; Zakja E; Fioretti PM; Livi U
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Mar; 15(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 16607907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prosthesis-patient mismatch is not clinically relevant in aortic valve replacement using the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve.
    Flameng W; Meuris B; Herijgers P; Herregods MC
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Aug; 82(2):530-6. PubMed ID: 16863756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.