BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15680865)

  • 1. Facilitated MIDCAB using a magnetic coupling device.
    Falk V; Walther T; Jacobs S; Wolf RK; Mohr FW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Feb; 79(2):691-3. PubMed ID: 15680865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic Vascular Port in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Klima U; MacVaugh H; Bagaev E; Maringka M; Kirschner S; Beilner J; Haverich A
    Circulation; 2004 Sep; 110(11 Suppl 1):II55-60. PubMed ID: 15364839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated distal coronary bypass with a novel magnetic coupler (MVP system).
    Filsoufi F; Farivar RS; Aklog L; Anderson CA; Chen RH; Lichtenstein S; Zhang J; Adams DH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Jan; 127(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 14752430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting for third-time coronary artery revascularization.
    Tabata S; Watanabe G; Iino K; Hagashidani K; Yamaguchi S; Tomita S; Arai S; Imagawa T; Saito H
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 13(6):417-20. PubMed ID: 18292728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [MIDCAB (minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass) using mini-CABG instruments: a case report].
    Kawata T; Kitamura S; Taniguchi S; Kobayashi S; Mizuguchi K; Abe T
    Kyobu Geka; 1997 Dec; 50(13):1098-100. PubMed ID: 9404108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facilitated endoscopic beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting using a magnetic coupling device.
    Falk V; Walther T; Stein H; Jacobs S; Walther C; Rastan A; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Mohr FW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Nov; 126(5):1575-9. PubMed ID: 14666035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic vascular coupling for distal anastomosis in coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter trial.
    Klima U; Falk V; Maringka M; Bargenda S; Badack S; Moritz A; Mohr F; Haverich A; Wimmer-Greinecker G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Nov; 126(5):1568-74. PubMed ID: 14666034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mid-term patency after magnetic coupling for distal bypass anastomosis in coronary surgery.
    Vicol C; Eifert S; Oberhoffer M; Boekstegers P; Reichart B
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Oct; 82(4):1452-6. PubMed ID: 16996952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronary artery bypass with the use of a magnetic distal anastomotic device: surgical technique and preliminary experience.
    Athanasiou T; Ashrafian H; Glenville B; Casula R
    Heart Surg Forum; 2004; 7(6):356-9. PubMed ID: 15769704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anastomotic devices for coronary artery bypass grafting: technological options and potential pitfalls.
    Gummert JF; Opfermann U; Jacobs S; Walther T; Kempfert J; Mohr FW; Falk V
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1384-93. PubMed ID: 17240365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anastomotic devices for coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Falk V; Walther T; Gummert JF
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2005 Mar; 2(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 16293059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anastomotic obstruction after magnetic vascular coupling after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Klima U; Kofidis T; Beilner J; Maringka M; Kirschner S; Haverich A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Feb; 81(2):728-9. PubMed ID: 16427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new needle driver for minientry coronary artery bypass.
    Ohtsuka T; Ninomiya M; Nonaka T; Maemura T
    Heart Surg Forum; 2004; 7(6):E559-61. PubMed ID: 15769686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coronary connector devices: analysis of 1,469 anastomoses in 1,216 patients.
    Suyker WJ; Borst C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 May; 85(5):1828-36. PubMed ID: 18442608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hybrid revascularization strategy: a pilot study on the association of robotically enhanced minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery and fractional-flow-reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Davidavicius G; Van Praet F; Mansour S; Casselman F; Bartunek J; Degrieck I; Wellens F; De Geest R; Vanermen H; Wijns W; De Bruyne B
    Circulation; 2005 Aug; 112(9 Suppl):I317-22. PubMed ID: 16159838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [MIDCAB procedure by original stabilizer and usual devices].
    Watanabe Y; Koyama N
    Kyobu Geka; 1998 Apr; 51(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 9567048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in a cardiac transplant recipient with allograft vasculopathy.
    Aleksic I; Piotrowski JA; Kamler M; Herold U; Jakob HG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Apr; 77(4):1433-4. PubMed ID: 15063284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acute graft failure caused by an intracoronary shunt in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Izutani H; Gill IS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Mar; 125(3):723-4. PubMed ID: 12658217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery by means of magnetic resonance imaging.
    Stauder NI; Fenchel M; Stauder H; Küttner A; Scheule AM; Kramer U; Claussen CD; Miller S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):607-14. PubMed ID: 15746745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-risk patients with multivessel disease--is there a role for incomplete myocardial revascularization via minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting?
    Jacobs S; Holzhey D; Falk V; Garbade J; Walther T; Mohr FW
    Heart Surg Forum; 2007; 10(6):E459-62. PubMed ID: 18187378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.