These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties. German MJ; Carrick TE; McCabe JF Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):951-6. PubMed ID: 18164051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials. Kugel G; Klettke T; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Perry RD; Sharma S J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 17362417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure. Hosseinpour D; Berg JC J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device. Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in water contact angles during the first phase of setting of dental impression materials. Mondon M; Ziegler C Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12675455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Working time of elastomeric impression materials: relevance of rheological tests. Balkenhol M; Kanehira M; Finger WJ; Wöstmann B Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 18269123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting. Berg JC; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Adán-Plaza S J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 12886208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applicable research in practice: understanding the hydrophilic and flow property measurements of impression materials. Perry RD; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Orfanidis J Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2006 Oct; 27(10):582-6. PubMed ID: 17120392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of impression removal force with elastomeric impression material rigidity and hardness. Walker MP; Alderman N; Petrie CS; Melander J; McGuire J J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 23387301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Erkut S; Can G J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection. Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates. Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker M J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18533981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations. Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Kess RS; Combe EC; Sparks BS J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 10898846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]