These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15681012)

  • 41. A new one-step dental flowable composite for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond strength study.
    Tecco S; Traini T; Caputi S; Festa F; de Luca V; D'Attilio M
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):672-7. PubMed ID: 16097240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of water and saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of a new light-cured cyanoacrylate adhesive.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Gatti S; Klersy C
    Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 17364037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
    Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites.
    Foek DL; Ozcan M; Krebs E; Sandham A
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Oct; 11(5):381-90. PubMed ID: 19841765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of the debonding strength of orthodontic brackets using three different bonding systems.
    Valletta R; Prisco D; De Santis R; Ambrosio L; Martina R
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 17962317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. In vitro evaluation of a moisture-active adhesive for indirect bonding.
    Klocke A; Shi J; Kahl-Nieke B; Bismayer U
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):697-701. PubMed ID: 14719735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Orthodontic bonding with varying curing time and light power using an argon laser.
    Elvebak BS; Rossouw PE; Miller BH; Buschang P; Ceen R
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):837-44. PubMed ID: 17029519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Tensile bond strength of brackets after antioxidant treatment on bleached teeth.
    Bulut H; Kaya AD; Turkun M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 16043470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of bleaching on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Stifanelli P; Scribante A; Klersy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 16849076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effect of high-intensity LED units at reduced curing time on in vitro bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Palomares NB; Cal-Neto JP; Sampaio-Filho H; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 18834003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Enamel surface after debracketing of orthodontic brackets bonded with flowable orthodontic composite. A comparison with a traditional orthodontic composite resin.
    Tecco S; Tetè S; D'Attilio M; Festa F
    Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Mar; 57(3):81-94. PubMed ID: 18427376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Movahhed HZ; Ogaard B; Syverud M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16043469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces.
    Trakyali G; Malkondu O; Kazazoğlu E; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 19339674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Custom base preaging in indirect bonding.
    Klocke A; Tadic D; Vaziri F; Kahl-Nieke B
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Feb; 74(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 15038498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading.
    Soderquist SA; Drummond JL; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):175.e7-175.e12. PubMed ID: 16473707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of different bonding conditions on the shear bond strength of two compomers to bovine dentin.
    Al-Nahedh H; Ateyah NZ
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):9-16. PubMed ID: 16957786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of surface treatment and aging on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets to provisional materials.
    Chay SH; Wong SL; Mohamed N; Chia A; Yap AU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):577.e7-11. PubMed ID: 18005828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.