349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15681717)
1. A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Broer J; Hoebe CJ; Steyerberg EW; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH
Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15681717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.
van Bergen J; Götz HM; Richardus JH; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ;
Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15681716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of Chlamydia trachomatis infection: application of a scoring rule to other populations.
Götz HM; Veldhuijzen IK; Habbema JD; Boeke AJ; Richardus JH; Steyerberg EW
Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Jun; 33(6):374-80. PubMed ID: 16505746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Risk factors for Clamydia infections of the genital organs in adolescent females].
Sedlecki K; Markovic M; Rajic G
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001; 129(7-8):169-74. PubMed ID: 11797445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population of Amsterdam. Il Over 90% participation and almost 5% prevalence].
van den Hoek JA; Mulder-Folkerts DK; Coutinho RA; Dukers NH; Buimer M; van Doornum GJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):668-72. PubMed ID: 10321299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis: results from the first national population-based survey in France.
Goulet V; de Barbeyrac B; Raherison S; Prudhomme M; Semaille C; Warszawski J;
Sex Transm Infect; 2010 Aug; 86(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 20660590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence and risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women in north-west of Italy.
Latino MA; Caneparo A; Rosso C; De Maria D; De Intinis G; Intorcia P; Petrinco M
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Feb; 60(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 18277350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in secondary schools, family planning and occupational health centres in Luxembourg.
Mossong J; Muller M; Majéry N; Mardaga C; Decruyenaere F; Schneider F
Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Oct; 85(6):455-8. PubMed ID: 19574242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young men.
Domeika M; Oscarsson L; Hallén A; Hjelm E; Sylvan S
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Jul; 21(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 17567309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Systematic home screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections of asymptomatic men and women in family practice by means of mail-in urine samples].
van Valkengoed IG; Boeke AJ; van den Brule AJ; Morré SA; Dekker JH; Meijer CJ; van Eijk JT
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):672-6. PubMed ID: 10321300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence and prediction of chlamydial cervical infection in a rural area: an UPRNet project.
Root DT; Hickner JM; Nelson TC
J Fam Pract; 1991 Oct; 33(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 1919453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity.
Op de Coul EL; Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Fennema JS; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; van der Sande MA; van den Broek IV
Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 22249297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008.
Simms I; Talebi A; Rhia J; Horner P; French RS; Sarah R; Macintosh M
Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Aug; 36(8):522-7. PubMed ID: 19455079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of Chlamydia trachomatis infection to facilitate selective screening on population and individual level: a cross-sectional study of a population-based screening programme.
van Klaveren D; Götz HM; Op de Coul EL; Steyerberg EW; Vergouwe Y
Sex Transm Infect; 2016 Sep; 92(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 26843401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections among the male and female population of the Republic of Macedonia.
Spasovski MS; Simjanovska LJ; Taleski V; Petrova N; Lazetic L; Popeska Z; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC; Efremov GD
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 15987287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Sydney women.
Chen MY; Rohrsheim R; Donovan B
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 45(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 16171478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in men in the mid-west of Ireland.
Powell J; O'Connor C; O'hlarlaithe M; Saunders J; De Freitas J
Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 15459401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Managing genital chlamydia trachomatis infection in Scotland: targeted opportunistic testing or a screening programme?
Clutterbuck DJ
Health Bull (Edinb); 2001 Nov; 59(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 12661390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The program cost and cost-effectiveness of screening men for Chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease in women.
Gift TL; Gaydos CA; Kent CK; Marrazzo JM; Rietmeijer CA; Schillinger JA; Dunne EF
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S66-75. PubMed ID: 18830137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
