241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15682014)
1. Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years.
Grob D; Benini A; Junge A; Mannion AF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Feb; 30(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 15682014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facet joint changes after application of lumbar nonfusion dynamic stabilization.
Lee SE; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E6. PubMed ID: 26721580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decompression in acquired lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instability.
Würgler-Hauri CC; Kalbarczyk A; Wiesli M; Landolt H; Fandino J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(3):E66-72. PubMed ID: 18303447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system.
Stoll TM; Dubois G; Schwarzenbach O
Eur Spine J; 2002 Oct; 11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S170-8. PubMed ID: 12384741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Dynamic neutralization using the Dynesys system for treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine].
Cienciala J; Chaloupka R; Repko M; Krbec M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Jun; 77(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 20619111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Schnake KJ; Schaeren S; Jeanneret B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 16481955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Beastall J; Karadimas E; Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Hughes J; Smith F; Wardlaw D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Koureas G; Lambiris E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):735-42. PubMed ID: 15087795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic stabilization for degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients.
Di Silvestre M; Lolli F; Bakaloudis G; Parisini P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 20081518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term functional outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion: randomized clinical study with a 5-year follow-up.
Bjarke Christensen F; Stender Hansen E; Laursen M; Thomsen K; Bünger CE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jun; 27(12):1269-77. PubMed ID: 12065973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Translaminar screw fixation of the lumbar spine: long-term outcome.
Aepli M; Mannion AF; Grob D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(14):1492-8. PubMed ID: 19525842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of a hybrid dynamic stabilization and fusion system in the lumbar spine: preliminary experience.
Maserati MB; Tormenti MJ; Panczykowski DM; Bonfield CM; Gerszten PC
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E2. PubMed ID: 20568918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Dynamic posterior stabilization with the pedicle screw system DYNESYS®].
Schwarzenbach O; Berlemann U
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2010 Nov; 22(5-6):545-57. PubMed ID: 21153012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of multisegmental transforaminal enlarged decompression plus posterior pedicle screw fixation for multilevel lumbar spinal canal stenosis associated with lumbar instability.
Sun C; Tian WJ; Liu HX; Guan PG
Int J Surg; 2018 Feb; 50():72-78. PubMed ID: 29329787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative study of dynamic neutralization system and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treating lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang B; Jiang T
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 27(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 23596677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term Outcome After Monosegmental L4/5 Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With the Dynesys Device.
Hoppe S; Schwarzenbach O; Aghayev E; Bonel H; Berlemann U
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):72-7. PubMed ID: 26889990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic stabilization using the Dynesys system versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disease: a clinical and radiological outcomes-based meta-analysis.
Lee CH; Jahng TA; Hyun SJ; Kim CH; Park SB; Kim KJ; Chung CK; Kim HJ; Lee SE
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E7. PubMed ID: 26721581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes of the Dynesys dynamic neutralization system: 1-year preliminary results.
Welch WC; Cheng BC; Awad TE; Davis R; Maxwell JH; Delamarter R; Wingate JK; Sherman J; Macenski MM
Neurosurg Focus; 2007 Dec; 22(1):E8. PubMed ID: 17608342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cost-utility analysis of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases.
Liu K; Sun W; Lu Q; Chen J; Tang J
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Nov; 22(6):982-987. PubMed ID: 28807742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
