These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1568313)
21. Laboratory sanctions for proficiency testing sample referral and result communication: a review of actions from 1993-2006. Killeen AA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Jun; 133(6):979-82. PubMed ID: 19492893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Proficiency testing performance in US laboratories: results reported to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 1994 through 2006. Howerton D; Krolak JM; Manasterski A; Handsfield JH Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 May; 134(5):751-8. PubMed ID: 20441507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy-based proficiency testing for estradiol measurements. Tim Cao Z; Rej R; Vesper H; Rex Astles J Clin Biochem; 2024 Feb; 124():110700. PubMed ID: 38043696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laboratory evaluation and assistance efforts: mailed, on-site and blind proficiency testing surveys conducted by the Centers for Disease Control. Boone DJ; Hansen HJ; Hearn TL; Lewis DS; Dudley D Am J Public Health; 1982 Dec; 72(12):1364-8. PubMed ID: 6291415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The clinical immunohistochemistry laboratory: regulations and troubleshooting guidelines. Fetsch PA; Abati A Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 588():399-412. PubMed ID: 20012854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Utilizing global data to estimate analytical performance on the Sigma scale: A global comparative analysis of methods, instruments, and manufacturers through external quality assurance and proficiency testing programs. Westgard SA Clin Biochem; 2016 Jun; 49(9):699-707. PubMed ID: 26948097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A systems approach to assure optimal proficiency testing in the hematology laboratory. Cembrowski GS; Engebretson MJ; Hackney JR; Carey RN Clin Lab Med; 1993 Dec; 13(4):973-85. PubMed ID: 8313692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance of the Kodak DT-60 physician's office analyzer as measured by CLIA-88 proposed evaluation criteria. Assessment of demographic and quality assurance factors influencing performance. Meier S; Ehrmeyer S; Laessig R; Woodlief G; Lanphear B; Hassemer D Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 May; 116(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 1580758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Medicare, Medicaid and CLIA programs; extension of certain effective dates for clinical laboratory requirements and personnel requirements for cytologists--HCFA. Final rule with comment period. Fed Regist; 1994 Dec; 59(233):62606-9. PubMed ID: 10138980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Should quality goals be defined for multicenter laboratory testing? Lessons learned from a pilot survey on a national surveillance program for diabetes. Wang L; Mo N; Pang R; Deng Q; Liu Y; Hu Y; Hu C; Wang L Int J Qual Health Care; 2016 Apr; 28(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 26796487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Choosing the right laboratory: a review of clinical and forensic toxicology services for urine drug testing in pain management. Reisfield GM; Goldberger BA; Bertholf RL J Opioid Manag; 2015; 11(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 25750163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Program: not your ordinary regulatory program. Brophy MA Mil Med; 2000 Jul; 165(7 Suppl 2):48-51. PubMed ID: 10920640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Compliance with the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 for hemoglobin screening--California, 1995. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1996 May; 45(20):419-22. PubMed ID: 8614398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Proficiency testing linked to the national reference system for the clinical laboratory: a proposal for achieving accuracy. Lasky FD Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1260-7; discussion 1268-72. PubMed ID: 1623591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Some realities and results of proficiency testing of laboratories performing toxicological analyses. Mason MF J Anal Toxicol; 1981; 5(5):201-8. PubMed ID: 7321544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Proficiency test performance as a predictor of accuracy of routine patient testing for theophylline. Jenny RW; Jackson KY Clin Chem; 1993 Jan; 39(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 8419063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality assurance program for pharmacokinetic assay of antiretrovirals: ACTG proficiency testing for pediatric and adult pharmacology support laboratories, 2003 to 2004: a requirement for therapeutic drug monitoring. Holland DT; DiFrancesco R; Connor JD; Morse GD Ther Drug Monit; 2006 Jun; 28(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 16778721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Process capability and stability of analytical systems assessed from proficiency testing data. Jenny RW Clin Chem; 1994 May; 40(5):723-8. PubMed ID: 8174243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA programs; laboratory requirements relating to quality systems and certain personnel qualifications. Final rule. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS Fed Regist; 2003 Jan; 68(16):3639-714. PubMed ID: 12545998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Proficiency testing performance: a case study with modeling. Waugh JM; Collier CP; Day AG; Waugh M; Raymond MJ Clin Biochem; 2002 Sep; 35(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 12413605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]