130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15683371)
41. Simultaneous measurement of pelvic floor muscle activity and vaginal blood flow: a pilot study.
Both S; Laan E
J Sex Med; 2007 May; 4(3):690-701. PubMed ID: 17433084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Vaginal pressure-pain thresholds: initial validation and reliability assessment in healthy women.
Tu FF; Fitzgerald CM; Kuiken T; Farrell T; Norman Harden R
Clin J Pain; 2008 Jan; 24(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 18180636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Reliability of speed of contraction and endurance dynamometric measurements of the pelvic floor musculature in stress incontinent parous women.
Morin M; Dumoulin C; Gravel D; Bourbonnais D; Lemieux MC
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(3):397-403; discussion 404. PubMed ID: 17262833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. "Comparative intra- and inter-rater reliability of maximal voluntary contraction with unidigital and bidigital vaginal palpation and construct validity with Peritron manometer".
Silva JBD; Sato TO; Rocha APR; Driusso P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Feb; 39(2):721-731. PubMed ID: 31873956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. An instrument to assess the dynamic characteristics of the circumvaginal musculature.
Dougherty MC; Abrams R; McKey PL
Nurs Res; 1986; 35(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 3636817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Pelvic floor function and anatomy after childbirth.
Baytur YB; Serter S; Tarhan S; Uyar Y; Inceboz U; Pabuscu Y
J Reprod Med; 2007 Jul; 52(7):604-10. PubMed ID: 17847758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. High spatial resolution pressure distribution of the vaginal canal in Pompoir practitioners: A biomechanical approach for assessing the pelvic floor.
Cacciari LP; Pássaro AC; Amorim AC; Sacco ICN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Aug; 47():53-60. PubMed ID: 28600995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Electrical stimulation and pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback in patients with fecal incontinence: a cohort study of 281 patients.
Terra MP; Dobben AC; Berghmans B; Deutekom M; Baeten CG; Janssen LW; Boeckxstaens GE; Engel AF; Felt-Bersma RJ; Slors JF; Gerhards MF; Bijnen AB; Everhardt E; Schouten WR; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Aug; 49(8):1149-59. PubMed ID: 16773492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effect of test position on pelvic floor muscle assessment.
Frawley HC; Galea MP; Phillips BA; Sherburn M; Bø K
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2006 Jun; 17(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 16205845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Reliability of bidirectional and variable-opening equipment for the measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength.
Nunes FR; Martins CC; Guirro EC; Guirro RR
PM R; 2011 Jan; 3(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 21257129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Postural and respiratory functions of the pelvic floor muscles.
Hodges PW; Sapsford R; Pengel LH
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(3):362-71. PubMed ID: 17304528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Vaginal high-pressure zone assessed by dynamic 3-dimensional ultrasound images of the pelvic floor.
Jung SA; Pretorius DH; Padda BS; Weinstein MM; Nager CW; den Boer DJ; Mittal RK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 197(1):52.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17618755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Reliability and validity of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using the MizCure perineometer.
Abe-Takahashi Y; Kitta T; Ouchi M; Okayauchi M; Chiba H; Higuchi M; Togo M; Shinohara N
BMC Womens Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):257. PubMed ID: 33213429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Clinical measurement of pelvic floor movement: evaluation of a new device.
Morren GL; Ryn AK; Hallböök O; Sjödahl R
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 May; 47(5):787-91; discussion 791-2. PubMed ID: 15073661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and tools.
Frawley HC; Galea MP; Phillips BA; Sherburn M; Bø K
Neurourol Urodyn; 2006; 25(3):236-242. PubMed ID: 16299815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Validity and reliability of an instrumented speculum designed to minimize the effect of intra-abdominal pressure on the measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength.
Ashton-Miller JA; Zielinski R; DeLancey JO; Miller JM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Dec; 29(10):1146-50. PubMed ID: 25307868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison between measurements obtained with three different perineometers.
Barbosa PB; Franco MM; Souza Fde O; Antônio FI; Montezuma T; Ferreira CH
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2009; 64(6):527-33. PubMed ID: 19578656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Can women without visible pubococcygeal muscle in MR images still increase urethral closure pressures?
Miller JM; Umek WH; Delancey JO; Ashton-Miller JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 15295360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluating the performance of pelvic floor exercises in women with urinary incontinence.
Russell AL; Grigo HM; Joseph NS; Niu J; Bachmann G
J Reprod Med; 2005 Jul; 50(7):529-32. PubMed ID: 16130851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Development of a dynamometer for measuring the isometric force of the pelvic floor musculature.
Dumoulin C; Bourbonnais D; Lemieux MC
Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 14595608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
