These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15685743)
1. The stem cell debate. America (NY); 2004 Dec; 191(18):3. PubMed ID: 15685743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. California makes unprecedented commitment to fund stem cell research. Willard LA J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(2):47-8. PubMed ID: 16538814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Government support for embryonic stem cell research. Ekemo A J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(4):66-7. PubMed ID: 16619449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bankrolling stem-cell research with California dollars. Yamamoto KR N Engl J Med; 2004 Oct; 351(17):1711-3. PubMed ID: 15496617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stem cells. Court rules in favor of California stem cell institute. Kaiser J Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5773):509. PubMed ID: 16645055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. California. Stem cell research could be ballot issue. Holden C Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5656):293. PubMed ID: 14726560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The California gambit. The Golden State has launched a 3bn dollar wager on stem cell science. Gibbs WW Sci Am; 2005 Jul; 293(1):A24-7. PubMed ID: 16008298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. California Stem Cell Research and Cures Act: what to expect from stem cell research? Panetta J; Wetherell J; Mehok M J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(4):3-12. PubMed ID: 16619447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stem cell research debate shifting to the courts. Vick KR J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 17111530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cell biology. U.S. states offer Asia stiff competition. Holden C Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5710):662-3. PubMed ID: 15692028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The intersection of law and medicine: the case for providing federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. Newhart AB Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):329-61. PubMed ID: 16485376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere. Kim S Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The bioethics agenda and the Bush second term. Cohen E New Atlantis; 2004 Fall-2005 Winter; 7():11-8. PubMed ID: 15812948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Looking for the ripple effect. Lawrence S Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):491-2. PubMed ID: 16783878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stem cell work gets states' aid after Bush veto. Rudoren J N Y Times Web; 2006 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16909489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ballot drive puts stem-cell funding in voters' hands. In California, diabetes groups show growing influence as they push for research; big backing from Hollywood. Regalado A; Waldholz M Wall St J (East Ed); 2004 Mar; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 15250089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Stem cell research. California flashes a green light. Holden C Science; 2002 Sep; 297(5590):2185. PubMed ID: 12351757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight. Fowler HL Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Embryonic stem-cell research--the case for federal funding. Drazen JM N Engl J Med; 2004 Oct; 351(17):1789-90. PubMed ID: 15496629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]