378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15685765)
21. Right of a defendant to refuse antipsychotic medication during a criminal trial.
Williams KG
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Sep; 50(4):1937-9. PubMed ID: 11660177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada.
Gutierrez L
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Madness on trial.
Cornwall J
New Sci; 2003 Mar; 177(2386):27. PubMed ID: 14587492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Developments in the law: the law of mental illness.
Harv Law Rev; 2008 Feb; 121(4):1114-91. PubMed ID: 18354871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Forcible medication of mentally ill criminal defendants: the case of Russell Eugene Weston, Jr.
Feinberg A
Stanford Law Rev; 2002 Apr; 54(4):769-91. PubMed ID: 11944661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary medication to restore trial competency--a workable standard?
Gerbasi JB; Scott CL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15497635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Competency to refuse psychotropic medication: three alternatives to the law's cognitive standard.
Saks ER
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1993 Jan; 47(3):689-761. PubMed ID: 16617526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
Quinlan M
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2005 Mar; (311):9-33. PubMed ID: 15869037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. "Mind control," "synthetic sanity," "artificial competence," and genuine confusion: legally relevant effects of antipsychotic medication.
Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
Hofstra Law Rev; 1983; 12(1):77-120. PubMed ID: 15739272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Treating incompetent defendants: the Supreme Court's decision is a tough Sell.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1335-6,1341. PubMed ID: 14557516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Criminal procedure--substantive due process--D.C. Circuit holds that the government may forcibly treat incompetent criminal defendants with antipsychotic medication to render them competent to stand trial. --United States v. Weston, 255 F.3d 873 (D.C. Cir. 2001), petition for cert. filed (U.S. Sept. 5, 2001) (No. 01-6161).
Harv Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 115(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 11958231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Fourteenth amendment--the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs masked by prison bars.
Sindel PE
J Crim Law Criminol; 1991; 81(4):952-80. PubMed ID: 16145787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Presumed dangerous: California's selective policy of forcibly medicating state prisoners with antipsychotic drugs.
Gross DE
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 2002 Jan; 35():483-517. PubMed ID: 17066562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a review of empirical studies.
Ladds B; Convit A
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(4):519-32. PubMed ID: 7718925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Sell effect: involuntary medication treatment is a "clear and convincing" success.
Cochrane RE; Herbel BL; Reardon ML; Lloyd KP
Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 22746284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Medicate-to-execute: current trends in death penalty jurisprudence and the perils of dual loyalty.
Shaivitz DS
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(1):149-74. PubMed ID: 15468506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. At law. One flew over the Supreme Court.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 1973926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Candor, zeal, and the substitution of judgement: ethics and the mentally ill criminal defendant.
King JD
Am Univ Law Rev; 2008 Dec; 58(2):207-66. PubMed ID: 20222213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Connecticut Experience with
Norko MA; Cotterell MS; Hollis T
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Dec; 48(4):473-483. PubMed ID: 32675332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
