These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15685962)

  • 41. Effects of recurrent tonal information on auditory working memory for pitch.
    Ries DT; DiGiovanni JJ
    Hear Res; 2009 Sep; 255(1-2):14-21. PubMed ID: 19435599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Timbral perception is influenced by unconscious presentation of hands playing musical instruments.
    Doi H; Yamaguchi K; Sugisaki S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jun; 75(6):1186-1191. PubMed ID: 34507501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Timing in aging: the role of attention.
    Vanneste S; Pouthas V
    Exp Aging Res; 1999; 25(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 11370109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Individual differences in working memory capacity and distractor processing: possible contribution of top-down inhibitory control.
    Minamoto T; Osaka M; Osaka N
    Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 1335():63-73. PubMed ID: 20381462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The tonal function of a task-irrelevant chord modulates speed of visual processing.
    Escoffier N; Tillmann B
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):1070-83. PubMed ID: 18076873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Musical stem completion: humming that note.
    Warker JA; Halpern AR
    Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(4):567-85. PubMed ID: 16402746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Action planning in sequential skills: relations to music performance.
    Keller PE; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):275-91. PubMed ID: 17853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Encoding strategies in primary school children: insights from an eye-tracking approach and the role of individual differences in attentional control.
    Roebers CM; Schmid C; Roderer T
    J Genet Psychol; 2010; 171(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 20333892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of timbre and tempo change on memory for music.
    Halpern AR; Müllensiefen D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Sep; 61(9):1371-84. PubMed ID: 19086302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Instrument specificity in experienced musicians.
    Drost UC; Rieger M; Prinz W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Apr; 60(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 17455063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Awareness of time distortions and its relation with time judgment: a metacognitive approach.
    Lamotte M; Izaute M; Droit-Volet S
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):835-42. PubMed ID: 22429850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Musical instrument familiarity affects statistical learning of tone sequences.
    Van Hedger SC; Johnsrude IS; Batterink LJ
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104949. PubMed ID: 34768123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Musical training mediates the relation between working memory capacity and preference for musical complexity.
    Vuvan DT; Simon E; Baker DJ; Monzingo E; Elliott EM
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Aug; 48(6):972-981. PubMed ID: 32193819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Selective working memory disables inhibition of visual features.
    Lucas C; Lauwereyns J
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 17953145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Shared Processing of Language and Music.
    Atherton RP; Chrobak QM; Rauscher FH; Karst AT; Hanson MD; Steinert SW; Bowe KL
    Exp Psychol; 2018 Jan; 65(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 29415645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessing Top-Down and Bottom-Up Contributions to Auditory Stream Segregation and Integration With Polyphonic Music.
    Disbergen NR; Valente G; Formisano E; Zatorre RJ
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():121. PubMed ID: 29563861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Attentional flexibility and memory capacity in conductors and pianists.
    Wöllner C; Halpern AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):198-208. PubMed ID: 26404532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Familiarity and preference for pitch probability profiles.
    Cui AX; Collett MJ; Troje NF; Cuddy LL
    Cogn Process; 2015 May; 16(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 25838257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Layman versus Professional Musician: Who Makes the Better Judge?
    Larrouy-Maestri P; Magis D; Grabenhorst M; Morsomme D
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135394. PubMed ID: 26308213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Nonverbal estimation during numerosity judgements by adult humans.
    Beran MJ; Taglialatela LA; Flemming TM; James FM; Washburn DA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Dec; 59(12):2065-82. PubMed ID: 17095488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.