These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15685973)

  • 1. New developments in sensor technology for water quality surveillance and early warning.
    Alcock SJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):1-6. PubMed ID: 15685973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ecotoxicological and environmental problems associated with the former chemical plant in Tarnowskie Gory, Poland.
    Malina G
    Toxicology; 2004 Dec; 205(3):157-72. PubMed ID: 15464626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Infrared optical sensors for water quality monitoring.
    Mizaikoff B
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):35-42. PubMed ID: 12636060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection of a battery of rapid toxicity sensors for drinking water evaluation.
    van der Schalie WH; James RR; Gargan TP
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2006 Jul; 22(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 16406499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrochemical sensors for environmental monitoring: design, development and applications.
    Hanrahan G; Patil DG; Wang J
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Aug; 6(8):657-64. PubMed ID: 15292947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved cell sensitivity and longevity in a rapid impedance-based toxicity sensor.
    Curtis TM; Tabb J; Romeo L; Schwager SJ; Widder MW; van der Schalie WH
    J Appl Toxicol; 2009 Jul; 29(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 19267359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vulnerability and risk evaluation of agricultural nitrogen pollution for Hungary's main aquifer using DRASTIC and GLEAMS models.
    Leone A; Ripa MN; Uricchio V; Deák J; Vargay Z
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2969-78. PubMed ID: 18054423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relating landscape characteristics to non-point source pollution in mine waste-located watersheds using geospatial techniques.
    Xiao H; Ji W
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 16551489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regionally contaminated aquifers--toxicological relevance and remediation options (Bitterfeld case study).
    Heidrich S; Schirmer M; Weiss H; Wycisk P; Grossmann J; Kaschl A
    Toxicology; 2004 Dec; 205(3):143-55. PubMed ID: 15464625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of ion-sensitive sensors in water quality monitoring.
    Winkler S; Rieger L; Saracevic E; Pressl A; Gruber G
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):105-14. PubMed ID: 15685986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring freshwater sediments.
    Alcock S; Barcelo D; Hansen PD
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2003 Aug; 18(8):1077-83. PubMed ID: 12782472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chemometric exploration of an amperometric biosensor array for fast determination of wastewater quality.
    Tønning E; Sapelnikova S; Christensen J; Carlsson C; Winther-Nielsen M; Dock E; Solna R; Skladal P; Nørgaard L; Ruzgas T; Emnéus J
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2005 Oct; 21(4):608-17. PubMed ID: 16202874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Biosence technology applied to environment monitoring].
    Zheng HL; Gong YK
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2003 Apr; 23(2):411-4. PubMed ID: 12961910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward a holistic and risk-based management of European river basins.
    Brack W; Apitz SE; Borchardt D; Brils J; Cardoso AC; Foekema EM; van Gils J; Jansen S; Harris B; Hein M; Heise S; Hellsten S; de Maagd PG; Müller D; Panov VE; Posthuma L; Quevauviller P; Verdonschot PF; von der Ohe PC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jan; 5(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 19132820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of water quality of polluted lake using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study.
    Kazi TG; Arain MB; Jamali MK; Jalbani N; Afridi HI; Sarfraz RA; Baig JA; Shah AQ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 18423587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental impact of toxic metals and metalloids from the Muñón Cimero mercury-mining area (Asturias, Spain).
    Loredo J; Ordóñez A; Alvarez R
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(3):455-67. PubMed ID: 16504385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mobility of heavy metals from tailings to stream waters in a mining activity contaminated site.
    Concas A; Ardau C; Cristini A; Zuddas P; Cao G
    Chemosphere; 2006 Apr; 63(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 16216301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in chemiresistors: does the nanoscale matter?
    Franke ME; Koplin TJ; Simon U
    Small; 2006 Jan; 2(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 17193551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health-based screening levels to evaluate U.S. Geological Survey ground water quality data.
    Toccalino PL; Norman JE
    Risk Anal; 2006 Oct; 26(5):1339-48. PubMed ID: 17054535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Potential impact of former Zn ore extraction activities on dissolved uranium distribution in the Riou-Mort watershed (France).
    Saari HK; Schmidt S; Coynel A; Huguet S; Schäfer J; Blanc G
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Sep; 382(2-3):304-10. PubMed ID: 17544484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.