These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15685978)

  • 1. Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation.
    Rosen C; Jeppsson U; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):41-9. PubMed ID: 15685978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy.
    Nopens I; Benedetti L; Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1967-74. PubMed ID: 21045320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards a benchmark simulation model for plant-wide control strategy performance evaluation of WWTPs.
    Jeppsson U; Rosen C; Alex J; Copp J; Gernaey KV; Pons MN; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 53(1):287-95. PubMed ID: 16532759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluation of fault detection methods for wastewater treatment processes.
    Corominas L; Villez K; Aguado D; Rieger L; Rosén C; Vanrolleghem PA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Feb; 108(2):333-44. PubMed ID: 20882518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies.
    Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Nopens I; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):67-78. PubMed ID: 17978434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study.
    Stare A; Vrecko D; Hvala N; Strmcnik S
    Water Res; 2007 May; 41(9):2004-14. PubMed ID: 17346768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Criteria for assessment of the operational potential of the urban wastewater system.
    Schütze M; Butler D; Beck MB; Verworn HR
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 11902465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New monitoring technique with an ICA algorithm in the wastewater treatment process.
    Lee JM; Yoo CK; Lee IB
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):49-56. PubMed ID: 12926669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Progress in sensor technology--progress in process control? Part 1: sensor property investigation and classification.
    Rieger L; Alex J; Winkler S; Boehler M; Thomann M; Siegrist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 12636068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards a global multi objective optimization of wastewater treatment plant based on modeling and genetic algorithms.
    Béraud B; Steyer JP; Lemoine C; Latrille E; Manic G; Printemps-Vacquier C
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(9):109-16. PubMed ID: 18025738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Progress in sensor technology--progress in process control? Part II: results from a simulation benchmark study.
    Alex J; Rieger L; Winkler S; Siegrist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 12636069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of control strategies using an oxidation ditch benchmark.
    Abusam A; Keesman KJ; Spanjers H; van SG; Meinema K
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):151-8. PubMed ID: 11936628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Climate change impacts on activated sludge wastewater treatment: a case study from Norway.
    Plósz BG; Liltved H; Ratnaweera H
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 19633397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parameter optimisation of real-time control strategies for urban wastewater systems.
    Schütze M; Butler D; Beck MB
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):139-46. PubMed ID: 11385840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wastewater treatment benchmark: what can be achieved with simple control?
    Vrecko D; Hvala N; Kocijan J
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):127-34. PubMed ID: 11936625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New framework for standardized notation in wastewater treatment modelling.
    Corominas LL; Rieger L; Takács I; Ekama G; Hauduc H; Vanrolleghem PA; Oehmen A; Gernaey KV; van Loosdrecht MC; Comeau Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):841-57. PubMed ID: 20182062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. WWTP dynamic disturbance modelling--an essential module for long-term benchmarking development.
    Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Jeppsson U
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 53(4-5):225-34. PubMed ID: 16722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generation of diurnal variation for influent data for dynamic simulation.
    Langergraber G; Alex J; Weissenbacher N; Woerner D; Ahnert M; Frehmann T; Halft N; Hobus I; Plattes M; Spering V; Winkler S
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1483-6. PubMed ID: 18496016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. System analysis for optimal control of a wastewater treatment benchmark.
    Vrecko D; Hvala N; Kocijan J; Zec M
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):199-206. PubMed ID: 11385848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.