These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15685996)

  • 21. Decision support systems in water and wastewater treatment process selection and design: a review.
    Hamouda MA; Anderson WB; Huck PM
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(7):1757-70. PubMed ID: 19809138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dynamic monitoring system for full-scale wastewater treatment plants.
    Yoo CK; Lee JM; Lee IB; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):163-71. PubMed ID: 15685992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contribution of Geographic Information Systems and location models to planning of wastewater systems.
    Leitão JP; Matos JS; Gonçalves AB; Matos JL
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 16206838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Wastewater garden--a system to treat wastewater with environmental benefits to community.
    Nair J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(2):413-8. PubMed ID: 18701794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Membrane coupled high-performance compact reactor: a new MBR system for advanced wastewater treatment.
    Yeon KM; Park JS; Lee CH; Kim SM
    Water Res; 2005 May; 39(10):1954-61. PubMed ID: 15913704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of a knowledge-based decision support system for identifying adequate wastewater treatment for small communities.
    Comas J; Alemany J; Poch M; Torrens A; Salgot M; Bou J
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):393-400. PubMed ID: 14753561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. EU demonstration project for separate discharge and treatment of urine, faeces and greywater--part II: cost comparison of different sanitation systems.
    Oldenburg M; Peter-Fröhlich A; Dlabacs C; Pawlowski L; Bonhomme A
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):251-7. PubMed ID: 17881859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automatic control strategy for step feed anoxic/aerobic biological nitrogen removal process.
    Zhu GB; Peng YZ; Wu SY; Wang SY
    J Environ Sci (China); 2005; 17(3):457-9. PubMed ID: 16083124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Problems of operation and main reasons for failure of membranes in tertiary treatment systems.
    Lazarova V; Gallego S; García Molina V; Rougé P
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1777-84. PubMed ID: 18547930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Membrane bio-reactors for decentralized wastewater treatment and reuse.
    Meuler S; Paris S; Hackner T
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(2):285-94. PubMed ID: 18701776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development and application of software tools for monitoring, assessment and reporting of data concerning the operation of urban wastewater treatment plants in Cyprus.
    Papadopoulos A; Malamis S; Moustakas K; Kiranoudis CT; Loizidou M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Jul; 130(1-3):255-70. PubMed ID: 17057957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
    De Wever H; Weiss S; Reemtsma T; Vereecken J; Müller J; Knepper T; Rörden O; Gonzalez S; Barcelo D; Dolores Hernando M
    Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predication of Fhhh potential in PTA wastewater treatment.
    Cheng SP; Shi L; Zhang XX; Yan J; Ding ZH; Hao CB
    J Environ Sci (China); 2004; 16(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 14971441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recirculating gravel filters: high-performance treatment at low cost for two small communities.
    Newton C; Wilson JP
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(6):1245-51. PubMed ID: 18845863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Climate change impacts on activated sludge wastewater treatment: a case study from Norway.
    Plósz BG; Liltved H; Ratnaweera H
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 19633397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The main wastewater treatment plant of Vienna: favourable operation conditions as a consequence of well designed tender procedures.
    Partaj T; Papp M; Weiss J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1467-73. PubMed ID: 18496014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of wastewater treatment plant design for small communities: environmental and economic aspects.
    Molinos-Senante M; Garrido-Baserba M; Reif R; Hernández-Sancho F; Poch M
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jun; 427-428():11-8. PubMed ID: 22578695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Alpine infrastructure in Central Europe: integral evaluation of wastewater treatment systems at mountain refuges.
    Weissenbacher N; Mayr E; Niederberger T; Aschauer C; Lebersorger S; Steinbacher G; Haberl R
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(12):2017-22. PubMed ID: 18587192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Controlled operation of a membrane SBR for inhibitory wastewater treatment.
    Vargas A; Sandoval JL; Buitrón G
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 19657160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Advances in distributed parameter approach to the dynamics and control of activated sludge processes for wastewater treatment.
    Lee TT; Wang FY; Newell RB
    Water Res; 2006 Mar; 40(5):853-69. PubMed ID: 16458947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.