223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15686095)
1. Resistance of ITI implant connectors to multivectorial fatigue load application.
Wiskott HW; Pavone AF; Scherrer SS; Renevey RR; Belser UC
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15686095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resistance of internal-connection implant connectors under rotational fatigue loading.
Wiskott HW; Jaquet R; Scherrer SS; Belser UC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 17465350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.
Khraisat A; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 12488853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
Dogus SM; Kurtz KS; Watanabe I; Griggs JA
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
Quek HC; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability.
Binon PP; McHugh MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 9171488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 11432656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Load fatigue performance of two implant-abutment combinations.
Basten CH; Nicholls JI; Daly CH; Taggart R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):522-8. PubMed ID: 8803348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing.
Ribeiro CG; Maia ML; Scherrer SS; Cardoso AC; Wiskott HW
J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 19(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 21710094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
