These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15686584)

  • 1. The symptoms of resource scarcity: judgments of food and finances influence preferences for potential partners.
    Nelson LD; Morrison EL
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Feb; 16(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15686584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does hunger influence judgments of female physical attractiveness?
    Swami V; Tovée MJ
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Aug; 97(Pt 3):353-63. PubMed ID: 16848948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preference for attractiveness and thinness in a partner: influence of internalization of the thin ideal and shape/weight dissatisfaction in heterosexual women, heterosexual men, lesbians, and gay men.
    Legenbauer T; Vocks S; Schäfer C; Schütt-Strömel S; Hiller W; Wagner C; Vögele C
    Body Image; 2009 Jun; 6(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 19443281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining body dissatisfaction in young men within a biopsychosocial framework.
    Bardone-Cone AM; Cass KM; Ford JA
    Body Image; 2008 Jun; 5(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 18463012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resource availability hypothesis: Perceived financial and caloric status affect individuals' height preferences for potential partners.
    Sun Q; Lou L; Lu J; Wang X; Zhong J; Tan X; Li Y; Liu Y
    Int J Psychol; 2016 Oct; 51(5):340-7. PubMed ID: 26033189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of leg-to-body ratio (LBR) on judgments of female physical attractiveness: assessments of computer-generated images varying in LBR.
    Frederick DA; Hadji-Michael M; Furnham A; Swami V
    Body Image; 2010 Jan; 7(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 19822462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relative contribution of profile body shape and weight to judgements of women's physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia.
    Swami V; Tovée MJ
    Body Image; 2007 Dec; 4(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 18089286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Body dissatisfaction among Chinese undergraduates and its implications for eating disorders in Hong Kong.
    Lee S; Leung T; Lee AM; Yu H; Leung CM
    Int J Eat Disord; 1996 Jul; 20(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 8807355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining "fat talk" experimentally in a female dyad: how are women influenced by another woman's body presentation style?
    Tucker KL; Martz DM; Curtin LA; Bazzini DG
    Body Image; 2007 Jun; 4(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 18089261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Height preferences in humans may not be universal: evidence from the Datoga people of Tanzania.
    Sorokowski P; Butovskaya ML
    Body Image; 2012 Sep; 9(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 22871368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Romantic interest in obese college students.
    Aruguete MS; Edman JL; Yates A
    Eat Behav; 2009 Aug; 10(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 19665095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior.
    Yamagishi T; Hashimoto H; Schug J
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 18578848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Body image preference in the United States and rural Thailand: an exploratory study.
    Sharps MJ; Price-Sharps JL; Hanson J
    J Psychol; 2001 Sep; 135(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11804005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Romantic preferences in Brazilian undergraduate students: from the short term to the long term.
    Castro FN; de Araújo Lopes F
    J Sex Res; 2011 Sep; 48(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 20830643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.
    Wood D; Brumbaugh CC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1226-44. PubMed ID: 19469598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social capital is associated with decreased risk of hunger.
    Martin KS; Rogers BL; Cook JT; Joseph HM
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 58(12):2645-54. PubMed ID: 15081212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Body dissatisfaction and body change behaviors in Chile: the role of sociocultural factors.
    Mellor D; McCabe M; Ricciardelli L; Merino ME
    Body Image; 2008 Jun; 5(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 18463011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood.
    Ferriman K; Lubinski D; Benbow CP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Sep; 97(3):517-32. PubMed ID: 19686005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cultural differences in unrealistic optimism and pessimism: the role of egocentrism and direct versus indirect comparison measures.
    Rose JP; Endo Y; Windschitl PD; Suls J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1236-48. PubMed ID: 18587057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.