These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15687628)

  • 1. Update on digital mammography.
    Conant EF; Maidment AD
    Breast Dis; 2001; 13():109-24. PubMed ID: 15687628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technology transfer in digital mammography. Report of the Joint National Cancer Institute-National Aeronautics and Space Administration workshop of May 19-20, 1993.
    Winfield D; Silbiger M; Brown GS; Clarke L; Dwyer S; Yaffe M; Shtern F
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Apr; 29(4):507-15. PubMed ID: 7913457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FDA & digital mammography: why has FDA required full field digital mammography systems to be regulated as potentially dangerous devices for more than 10 years?
    Nields MW
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):652-7. PubMed ID: 20380981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute.
    Shtern F
    Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):629-30. PubMed ID: 1584908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Off Label" Use of FDA-Approved Devices and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1149-51. PubMed ID: 26496566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CR digital mammography: an affordable entry.
    Fischer C
    Radiol Manage; 2006; 28(5):38-42; quiz 43-5. PubMed ID: 17191546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology.
    Pisano ED; Gatsonis CA; Yaffe MJ; Hendrick RE; Tosteson AN; Fryback DG; Bassett LW; Baum JK; Conant EF; Jong RA; Rebner M; D'Orsi CJ
    Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):404-12. PubMed ID: 15961755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital mammography. Why hasn't it been approved for U.S. hospitals?
    Health Devices; 2000 Jan; 29(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 10631559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Update in digital mammography.
    Hogge JP; Artz DS; Freedman MT
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997; 38(1):89-113. PubMed ID: 9063622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital versus screen-film mammography: impact of mammographic density and hormone therapy on breast cancer detection.
    Chiarelli AM; Prummel MV; Muradali D; Shumak RS; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Done SJ; Yaffe MJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Nov; 154(2):377-87. PubMed ID: 26518019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population.
    Seo BK; Pisano ED; Kuzmiak CM; Koomen M; Pavic D; McLelland R; Lee Y; Cole EB; Mattingly D; Lee J
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1229-35. PubMed ID: 16979072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital mammography screening: average glandular dose and first performance parameters.
    Weigel S; Girnus R; Czwoydzinski J; Decker T; Spital S; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):892-5. PubMed ID: 17705112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical devices; radiology devices; reclassification of full-field digital mammography system. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2010 Nov; 75(214):68200-3. PubMed ID: 21053532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What every surgical oncologist should know about digital mammography.
    Pisano ED; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Cance W
    Semin Surg Oncol; 2001; 20(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 11523102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact on breast cancer diagnosis in a multidisciplinary unit after the incorporation of mammography digitalization and computer-aided detection systems.
    Romero C; Varela C; Muñoz E; Almenar A; Pinto JM; Botella M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1492-7. PubMed ID: 22109307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementing digital quality control in a breast center.
    Parikh J; Fanus D
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):854-60. PubMed ID: 17411717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of full-field digital mammography on pre-operative diagnosis and surgical treatment of mammographic microcalcification.
    Bundred SM; Zhou J; Whiteside S; Morris J; Wilson M; Hurley E; Bundred N
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jan; 143(2):359-66. PubMed ID: 24318468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.