These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15687628)

  • 21. Impact of full field digital mammography on the classification and mammographic characteristics of interval breast cancers.
    Knox M; O'Brien A; Szabó E; Smith CS; Fenlon HM; McNicholas MM; Flanagan FL
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 84(6):1056-61. PubMed ID: 25816990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Johnson MM
    Radiol Technol; 2017 Jan; 88(3):299M-319M. PubMed ID: 28298592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Smith AP; Hall PA; Marcello DM
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 15377106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement.
    Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Jeunehomme F; Muller S; Hamm B; Bick U
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):397-404. PubMed ID: 15973130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Chen SC; Carton AK; Albert M; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 17236995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [New mammography technologies and their impact on radiation dose].
    Chevalier del Rio M
    Radiologia; 2013 Dec; 55 Suppl 2():25-34. PubMed ID: 24246883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review.
    Skaane P
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jan; 50(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 19037825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Screening Mammography Findings From One Standard Projection Only in the Era of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Cohen EO; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Mayo RC; Leung JWT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):445-451. PubMed ID: 29792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
    Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detection of early breast cancer: an overview and future prospects.
    Zhou XH; Gordon R
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(3):203-55. PubMed ID: 2673660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Utilization Updates.
    Boroumand G; Teberian I; Parker L; Rao VM; Levin DC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1092-1096. PubMed ID: 29570370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital mammography: an update.
    Hailey D
    Issues Emerg Health Technol; 2006 Oct; (91):1-4. PubMed ID: 17073037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of ultrasonography and digital mammography in women under 40 years with symptomatic breast cancer: a 7-year Irish experience.
    Redmond CE; Healy GM; Murphy CF; O'Doherty A; Foster A
    Ir J Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 186(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 27271165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer.
    Lewin JM; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE; Moss LJ; Isaacs PK; Karellas A; Cutter GR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):671-7. PubMed ID: 12185042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 1. Tissue and related risk factors.
    Heine JJ; Malhotra P
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Mar; 9(3):298-316. PubMed ID: 11887946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Full-field digital mammography with amorphous silicon-based flat- panel detector: physical imaging characteristics and signal detection].
    Ideguchi T; Higashida Y; Himuro K; Ohki M; Nakamura S; Yoshida A; Takagi R; Hatano H; Kuwahara R; Toyonaga M; Tanaka I; Toyofuku F
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Mar; 60(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 15131510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Digital breast tomosynthesis].
    Preibsch H; Siegmann-Luz KC
    Radiologe; 2015 Jan; 55(1):59-67; quiz 68-70. PubMed ID: 25609581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Moseley TW
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 59(2):362-79. PubMed ID: 27101241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.