These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15689528)

  • 1. Bayes empirical bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection.
    Yang Z; Wong WS; Nielsen R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Apr; 22(4):1107-18. PubMed ID: 15689528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying sites under positive selection with uncertain parameter estimates.
    Aris-Brosou S
    Genome; 2006 Jul; 49(7):767-76. PubMed ID: 16936785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Smoothed Bootstrap Aggregation for Assessing Selection Pressure at Amino Acid Sites.
    Mingrone J; Susko E; Bielawski J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Nov; 33(11):2976-2989. PubMed ID: 27486222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and power of bayes prediction of amino acid sites under positive selection.
    Anisimova M; Bielawski JP; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):950-8. PubMed ID: 12032251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection.
    Kosakovsky Pond SL; Frost SD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1208-22. PubMed ID: 15703242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites.
    Yang Z; Nielsen R; Goldman N; Pedersen AM
    Genetics; 2000 May; 155(1):431-49. PubMed ID: 10790415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Codon-substitution models to detect adaptive evolution that account for heterogeneous selective pressures among site classes.
    Yang Z; Swanson WJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 11752189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian model comparison approach to inferring positive selection.
    Scheffler K; Seoighe C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2531-40. PubMed ID: 16120799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A maximum likelihood method for detecting functional divergence at individual codon sites, with application to gene family evolution.
    Bielawski JP; Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 2004 Jul; 59(1):121-32. PubMed ID: 15383915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian estimation of nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratios for pairwise sequence comparisons.
    Angelis K; Dos Reis M; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Jul; 31(7):1902-13. PubMed ID: 24748652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting Adaptation in Protein-Coding Genes Using a Bayesian Site-Heterogeneous Mutation-Selection Codon Substitution Model.
    Rodrigue N; Lartillot N
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Jan; 34(1):204-214. PubMed ID: 27744408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of recombination on the accuracy of the likelihood method for detecting positive selection at amino acid sites.
    Anisimova M; Nielsen R; Yang Z
    Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1229-36. PubMed ID: 12871927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selecton 2007: advanced models for detecting positive and purifying selection using a Bayesian inference approach.
    Stern A; Doron-Faigenboim A; Erez E; Martz E; Bacharach E; Pupko T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W506-11. PubMed ID: 17586822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New methods for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
    Suzuki Y
    J Mol Evol; 2004 Jul; 59(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 15383903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian estimation of positively selected sites.
    Huelsenbeck JP; Dyer KA
    J Mol Evol; 2004 Jun; 58(6):661-72. PubMed ID: 15461423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A counting renaissance: combining stochastic mapping and empirical Bayes to quickly detect amino acid sites under positive selection.
    Lemey P; Minin VN; Bielejec F; Kosakovsky Pond SL; Suchard MA
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Dec; 28(24):3248-56. PubMed ID: 23064000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level.
    Zhang J; Nielsen R; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2472-9. PubMed ID: 16107592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The site-wise log-likelihood score is a good predictor of genes under positive selection.
    Wang HC; Susko E; Roger AJ
    J Mol Evol; 2013 May; 76(5):280-94. PubMed ID: 23595859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phylogenetic analysis and positive-selection site detecting of vascular endothelial growth factor family in vertebrates.
    He W; Tang Y; Qi B; Lu C; Qin C; Wei Y; Yi J; Chen M
    Gene; 2014 Feb; 535(2):345-52. PubMed ID: 24200960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring natural selection operating on conservative and radical substitution at single amino acid sites.
    Suzuki Y
    Genes Genet Syst; 2007 Aug; 82(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 17895585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 64.