BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15690091)

  • 1. Visualisation of natural aquatic colloids and particles -- a comparison of conventional high vacuum and environmental scanning electron microscopy.
    Doucet FJ; Lead JR; Maguire L; Achterberg EP; Millward GE
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Feb; 7(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 15690091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The surface topography of the choroid plexus. Environmental, low and high vacuum scanning electron microscopy.
    Mestres P; Pütz N; Garcia Gómez de Las Heras S; García Poblete E; Morguet A; Laue M
    Ann Anat; 2011 May; 193(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 21466950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of environmental scanning electron microscopy with high vacuum scanning electron microscopy as applied to the assessment of cell morphology.
    McKinlay KJ; Allison FJ; Scotchford CA; Grant DM; Oliver JM; King JR; Wood JV; Brown PD
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 May; 69(2):359-66. PubMed ID: 15058009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observations of the intestinal mucosa using environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM); comparison with conventional scanning electron microscopy (CSEM).
    Habold C; Dunel-Erb S; Chevalier C; Laurent P; Le Maho Y; Lignot JH
    Micron; 2003; 34(8):373-9. PubMed ID: 14680923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of environmental scanning electron microscopy for imaging wet and insulating materials.
    Donald AM
    Nat Mater; 2003 Aug; 2(8):511-6. PubMed ID: 12894259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advantages of environmental scanning electron microscopy in studies of microorganisms.
    Collins SP; Pope RK; Scheetz RW; Ray RI; Wagner PA; Little BJ
    Microsc Res Tech; 1993 Aug; 25(5-6):398-405. PubMed ID: 8400431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhanced visualization of microbial biofilms by staining and environmental scanning electron microscopy.
    Priester JH; Horst AM; Van de Werfhorst LC; Saleta JL; Mertes LA; Holden PA
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):577-87. PubMed ID: 17196692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low pressure mode combined with OsO4 vapor fixation and sputter-coating for the preservation of delicate aerial hyphae and conidia in the ESEM.
    Coetzee SH; Jordaan A; Mpuchane SF
    Microsc Res Tech; 2005 Aug; 67(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 16170822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A critical overview of ESEM applications in the biological field.
    Muscariello L; Rosso F; Marino G; Giordano A; Barbarisi M; Cafiero G; Barbarisi A
    J Cell Physiol; 2005 Dec; 205(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 15965928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of environmental particles by atomic force microscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy.
    Mavrocordatos D; Pronk W; Boiler M
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):9-18. PubMed ID: 15685998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of ESEM to environmental colloids.
    Nuttall HE; Kale R
    Microsc Res Tech; 1993 Aug; 25(5-6):439-46. PubMed ID: 8400438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct preparation of particles from liquid suspension for ESEM or SEM analysis.
    Wight SA; Holbrook RD
    J Microsc; 2005 Oct; 220(Pt 1):65-9. PubMed ID: 16269064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental scanning electron microscope imaging examples related to particle analysis.
    Wight SA; Zeissler CJ
    Microsc Res Tech; 1993 Aug; 25(5-6):393-7. PubMed ID: 8400430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Size fractionation and characterisation of fresh water colloids and particles: split-flow thin-cell and electron microscopy analyses.
    De Momi A; Lead JR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Nov; 40(21):6738-43. PubMed ID: 17144304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Size determination of Acipenser ruthenus spermatozoa in different types of electron microscopy.
    Psenicka M; Tesarová M; Tesitel J; Nebesárová J
    Micron; 2010 Jul; 41(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 20226681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An introduction to process visualization capabilities and considerations in the environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM).
    Prack ER
    Microsc Res Tech; 1993 Aug; 25(5-6):487-92. PubMed ID: 8400443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wet STEM: a new development in environmental SEM for imaging nano-objects included in a liquid phase.
    Bogner A; Thollet G; Basset D; Jouneau PH; Gauthier C
    Ultramicroscopy; 2005 Oct; 104(3-4):290-301. PubMed ID: 15990230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental scanning electron microscope imaging of vesicle systems.
    Perrie Y; Ali H; Kirby DJ; Mohammed AU; McNeil SE; Vangala A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 606():319-31. PubMed ID: 20013405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of four different processing techniques on the microstructure of potatoes: comparison with fresh samples in the ESEM.
    Uwins PJ; Murray M; Gould RJ
    Microsc Res Tech; 1993 Aug; 25(5-6):412-8. PubMed ID: 8400433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of environmental scanning electron microscopy to determine biological surface structure.
    Kirk SE; Skepper JN; Donald AM
    J Microsc; 2009 Feb; 233(2):205-24. PubMed ID: 19220687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.