243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15690288)
1. Comparison of 2 methods of making surgical models for correction of facial asymmetry.
Wong TY; Fang JJ; Chung CH; Huang JS; Lee JW
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Feb; 63(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 15690288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the matching optimal symmetry plane method in planning surgical correction of facial asymmetry--a preliminary report of 20 patients.
Wong TY; Liu JK; Fang JJ; Wu TC; Tu YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1180.e1-13. PubMed ID: 24742699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Virtual reality surgical planning for maxillofacial distraction osteogenesis: the role of reverse engineering rapid prototyping and cooperative work.
Robiony M; Salvo I; Costa F; Zerman N; Bazzocchi M; Toso F; Bandera C; Filippi S; Felice M; Politi M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 65(6):1198-208. PubMed ID: 17517306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Theoretical considerations for the surgical correction of mandibular deformity in hemifacial microsomia patients using multifocal distraction osteogenesis.
Kunz C; Brauchli L; Moehle T; Rahn B; Hammer B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 12618978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distraction osteogenesis: a method to improve facial balance in asymmetric patients.
Robiony M
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):508-12. PubMed ID: 20216446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of virtual reality and stereolithographic models in maxillo-facial surgical planning.
Robiony M; Salvo I; Costa F; Zerman N; Bandera C; Filippi S; Felice M; Politi M
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):482-9. PubMed ID: 18362729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative 3D soft tissue analysis of symmetry prior to and after unilateral cleft lip repair compared with non-cleft persons (performed in Cambodia).
Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Chaitidis D; Berg-Boerner I; Krol Z; Kovacs L; Schwenzer NF; Zimmerer S; Holberg C; Zeilhofer HF
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 36(8):431-8. PubMed ID: 18701312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional computer-assisted simulation combining facial skeleton with facial morphology for orthognathic surgery.
Chen LH; Chen WH
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 10686837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified animal model and computer-assisted approach for dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis to reconstruct unilateral maxillectomy defect.
Feng Z; Zhao J; Zhou L; Dong Y; Zhao Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2266-74. PubMed ID: 19761922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Virtual model surgery and wafer fabrication for orthognathic surgery.
Choi JY; Song KG; Baek SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1306-10. PubMed ID: 19596555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Soft tissue changes after orthodontic surgical correction of jaws asymmetry evaluated by three-dimensional surface laser scanner.
Verzé L; Bianchi FA; Schellino E; Ramieri G
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1448-52. PubMed ID: 22976633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planing and simulation. 3D soft tissue planning and prediction.
Xia J; Samman N; Yeung RW; Wang D; Shen SG; Ip HH; Tideman H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Aug; 29(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 11030394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CAD/CAM fabrication and clinical application of surgical template and bone model in oral implant surgery.
Sohmura T; Kusumoto N; Otani T; Yamada S; Wakabayashi K; Yatani H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 19126112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional analysis of facial symmetry in cleft lip and palate patients using optical surface data.
Stauber I; Vairaktaris E; Holst A; Schuster M; Hirschfelder U; Neukam FW; Nkenke E
J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jul; 69(4):268-82. PubMed ID: 18797831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards building a photo-realistic virtual human face for craniomaxillofacial diagnosis and treatment planning.
Ayoub AF; Xiao Y; Khambay B; Siebert JP; Hadley D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 May; 36(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 17428638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method.
Hajeer MY; Ayoub AF; Millett DT; Bock M; Siebert JP
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):318-30. PubMed ID: 12593004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional facial surface analysis of patients with skeletal malocclusion.
Alves PV; Zhao L; Patel PK; Bolognese AM
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 19218859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of skeletal movements in mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Yeshwant K; Seldin EB; Gateno J; Everett P; White CL; Kikinis R; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 15742283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An advanced hybrid cutting method with an improved state machine for surgical simulation.
Zhang J; Gu L; Li X; Fang M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jan; 33(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 19058949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
