These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15690615)

  • 1. Low-dose dental computed tomography: significant dose reduction without loss of image quality.
    Rustemeyer P; Streubühr U; Suttmoeller J
    Acta Radiol; 2004 Dec; 45(8):847-53. PubMed ID: 15690615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Low-dosage dental CT].
    Rustemeyer P; Streubühr U; Hohn HP; Rustemeyer R; Eich HT; John-Mikolajewski V; Müller RD
    Rofo; 1999 Aug; 171(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 10506887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation dose in dental radiology.
    Cohnen M; Kemper J; Möbes O; Pawelzik J; Mödder U
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Mar; 12(3):634-7. PubMed ID: 11870479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
    Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-dose protocol of the spiral CT in orthodontics: comparative evaluation of entrance skin dose with traditional X-ray techniques.
    Cordasco G; Portelli M; Militi A; Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Gatto E; Lucchese A
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():24. PubMed ID: 24325970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
    Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ESTIMATION OF EFFECTIVE DOSE OF DENTAL X-RAY DEVICES.
    Qiang W; Qiang F; Lin L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):417-421. PubMed ID: 30169836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chau AC; Fung K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT].
    Coppenrath E; Draenert F; Lechel U; Veit R; Meindl T; Reiser M; Mueller-Lisse U
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 18543414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo, thyroid and lens surface exposure with spiral and conventional computed tomography in dental implant radiography.
    Bianchi J; Goggins W; Rudolph M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Aug; 90(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 10936846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
    Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device.
    Mah JK; Danforth RA; Bumann A; Hatcher D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 14561979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of radiation exposure in low-dose multislice computed tomography of the heart and comparison with a calculation program.
    Hohl C; Mühlenbruch G; Wildberger JE; Leidecker C; Süss C; Schmidt T; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1841-6. PubMed ID: 16456650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography.
    Schulze D; Heiland M; Thurmann H; Adam G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 15313998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New developed urological protocols for the Uro Dyna-CT reduce radiation exposure of endourological patients below the levels of the low dose standard CT scans.
    Rassweiler MC; Banckwitz R; Koehler C; Mueller-Allissat B; Michel MS; Häcker A; Ritter M
    World J Urol; 2014 Oct; 32(5):1213-8. PubMed ID: 24169818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of a dose monitoring software tool based on Monte Carlo Simulation in assessment of eye lens doses for cranial CT scans.
    Guberina N; Suntharalingam S; Naßenstein K; Forsting M; Theysohn J; Wetter A; Ringelstein A
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Oct; 58(10):955-959. PubMed ID: 27438801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality and effective dose of a robotic flat panel 3D C-arm vs computed tomography.
    Kraus M; Fischer E; Gebhard F; Richter PH
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Dec; 12(4):743-750. PubMed ID: 26678361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.