128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15690725)
21. Physical-space refraction-corrected transmission ultrasound computed tomography made computationally practical.
Li S; Mueller K; Jackowski M; Dione D; Staib L
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):280-8. PubMed ID: 18982616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Synthetic aperture imaging in breast ultrasound: a preliminary clinical study.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Kim C; Park J; Yoo Y; Moon WK; Cho N; Choi BI
Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):923-9. PubMed ID: 22633005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Paired-angle multiplicative compounding.
Macione J; Yang Z; Fox M
Ultrason Imaging; 2008 Apr; 30(2):112-30. PubMed ID: 18939612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Breast Cancer Ultrasound Images' Sequence Exploration Using BI-RADS Features' Extraction: Towards an Advanced Clinical Aided Tool for Precise Lesion Characterization.
Sellami L; Ben Sassi O; Chtourou K; Ben Hamida A
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2015 Oct; 14(7):740-5. PubMed ID: 26513796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computerized lesion segmentation of breast ultrasound based on marker-controlled watershed transformation.
Gómez W; Leija L; Alvarenga AV; Infantosi AF; Pereira WC
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 20175469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Phantom study of the impact of reconstruction parameters on the detection of mini- and micro-volume lesions with a low-dose PET/CT acquisition protocol.
Ferretti A; Bellan E; Gava M; Chondrogiannis S; Massaro A; Nibale O; Rubello D
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3363-70. PubMed ID: 22613508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ultrasonographic contrast-agent imaging of sub-millimeter vessel structures with spatial compounding: in vitro analyses.
Hansen C; Hüttebräuker N; Wilkening W; Ashfaq M; Ermert H
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Aug; 52(4):274-83. PubMed ID: 17691860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multifrequency vibro-acoustography.
Urban MW; Silva GT; Fatemi M; Greenleaf JF
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Oct; 25(10):1284-95. PubMed ID: 17024832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Classification of simulated hyperplastic stages in the breast ducts based on ultrasound RF echo.
Taslidere E; Cohen FS; Georgiou G
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jan; 55(1):50-63. PubMed ID: 18334313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bimodal Multiparameter-Based Approach for Benign-Malignant Classification of Breast Tumors.
Ara SR; Alam F; Rahman MH; Akhter S; Awwal R; Hasan K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2022-38. PubMed ID: 25913281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 3D estimation of soft biological tissue deformation from radio-frequency ultrasound volume acquisitions.
Deprez JF; Brusseau E; Schmitt C; Cloutier G; Basset O
Med Image Anal; 2009 Feb; 13(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 18823814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.
Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dynamic Enhancement of B-Mode Cardiac Ultrasound Image Sequences.
Perperidis A; Cusack D; White A; McDicken N; MacGillivray T; Anderson T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1533-1548. PubMed ID: 28450036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Enhanced lesion-to-bubble ratio on ultrasonic Nakagami imaging for monitoring of high-intensity focused ultrasound.
Zhang S; Li C; Zhou F; Wan M; Wang S
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jun; 33(6):959-70. PubMed ID: 24866603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Combining low-, high-level and empirical domain knowledge for automated segmentation of ultrasonic breast lesions.
Madabhushi A; Metaxas DN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12715992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of various breast factors on the quality of strain elastograms.
Song G; Jing L; Yan M; Cong S; Xuejiao W
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Mar; 34(3):395-400. PubMed ID: 25715360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improving the contrast of breast cancer masses in ultrasound using an autoregressive model based filter.
von Lavante E; Noble JA
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):153-60. PubMed ID: 18051054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Automatic mammary duct detection in 3D ultrasound.
Gooding MJ; Mellor M; Shipley JA; Broadbent KA; Goddard DA
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):434-41. PubMed ID: 16685875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A model of distributed phase aberration for deblurring phase estimated from scattering.
Tillett JC; Astheimer JP; Waag RC
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Jan; 57(1):214-28. PubMed ID: 20040448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
