These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15690927)

  • 1. The effect of body position and mattress type on interface pressure in quadriplegic adults: a pilot study.
    Moody P; Gonzales I; Cureton VY
    Dermatol Nurs; 2004 Dec; 16(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 15690927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preventing pressure ulcers: an evaluation of four operating-table mattresses.
    Defloor T; De Schuijmer JD
    Appl Nurs Res; 2000 Aug; 13(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 10960997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.
    Whittemore R; Bautista C; Smith C; Bruttomesso K
    J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 8347757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of position and mattress on interface pressure.
    Defloor T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2000 Feb; 13(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 10701278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interface pressure characteristics of alternating air cell mattresses in persons with spinal cord injury.
    Goetz LL; Brown GS; Priebe MM
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2002; 25(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 12214903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the effectiveness of assisted turning mattresses and conventional air mattresses in relieving body pressure in different lying positions.
    Wu SV; Kuo LM; Tsai JM; Lin LJ; Chu CH; Liao YY
    Assist Technol; 2024 Jul; 36(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 36445182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of interface pressures in the evaluation of operating theatre mattresses.
    Scott EM; Baker EA; Kelly PJ; Stoddard EJ; Leaper DJ
    J Wound Care; 1999 Oct; 8(9):437-41. PubMed ID: 10818892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skin vascular reaction to standard patient positioning on a hospital mattress.
    Barnett RI; Ablarde JA
    Adv Wound Care; 1994 Jan; 7(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 8149049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the effectiveness of two pressure-relieving surfaces: low-air-loss versus static fluid.
    Hardin JB; Cronin SN; Cahill K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Sep; 46(9):50-6. PubMed ID: 11189541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pressure relief characteristics of an alternating pressure system.
    Stewart TP; McKay MG; Magnano S
    Decubitus; 1990 Nov; 3(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 2242234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interface pressure at different degrees of backrest elevation with various types of pressure-redistribution surfaces.
    Lippoldt J; Pernicka E; Staudinger T
    Am J Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 23(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 24585160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tissue interface pressure and estimated subcutaneous pressures of 11 different pressure-reducing support surfaces.
    Thompson-Bishop JY; Mottola CM
    Decubitus; 1992 Mar; 5(2):42-6, 48. PubMed ID: 1558691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of two pressure-relieving devices on the prevention of heel pressure ulcers.
    Tymec AC; Pieper B; Vollman K
    Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9204803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pressure-relieving properties of a intra-operative warming device.
    Baker EA; Leaper DJ
    J Wound Care; 2003 Apr; 12(4):156-60. PubMed ID: 12715489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of 10-degree leg elevation and 30-degree head elevation on body displacement and sacral interface pressures over a 2-hour period.
    Harada C; Shigematsu T; Hagisawa S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2002 May; 29(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 12011906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Prevention of pressure ulcers: retrospective study regarding the effectiveness of an alternate pressure device].
    Rasero L; Fabbri C; Cantasano L; Lotti T; Pucci T; Veratti M; Rossi M
    Prof Inferm; 2007; 60(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 18289496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The QUATTRO ACUTE mattress and pressure ulcer prevention.
    Hampton S
    Br J Nurs; 2003 Jun 12-25; 12(11):697-8, 700-1. PubMed ID: 12829970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between body weight, body position, support surface, and tissue interface pressure at the sacrum.
    Rondorf-Klym LM; Langemo D
    Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 8427641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microcirculatory responses of sacral tissue in healthy individuals and inpatients on different pressure-redistribution mattresses.
    Bergstrand S; Källman U; Ek AC; Engström M; Lindgren M
    J Wound Care; 2015 Aug; 24(8):346-58. PubMed ID: 26562377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the pressure-distributing properties of foam mattress overlays.
    Krouskop TA; Noble PS; Brown J; Marburger R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jul; 23(3):33-9. PubMed ID: 3772816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.